SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Open Science Practices at Imaging Journals: A Meta-Research Study
12 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Open Science Practices at Imaging Journals: A Meta-Research Study (2023)Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Open Scienc…The growing role of social media for research and education in radiology (2023)The growing role of social me…US government reveals big changes to open-access policy (2022)US government reveals big cha…Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication (2021)Reaping the benefits of open …Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scho…Open science practices in clinical psychology journals: An audit study. (2019)Open science practices in cli…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline (2018)Completeness of Reporting of …What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnost…How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)How open science helps resear…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python (2011)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal (2017)Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2018)Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data – which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? (2016)Evaluating the evidential value of empirically supported psychological treatments (ESTs): A meta-scientific review. (2019)Increase value and reduce waste in research on psychological therapies (2019)Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occurred frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials—A meta-epidemiologic study (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) (2019)Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy (2020)Searching for and selecting studies (2023)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Replacing academic journals (2023)The future of academic publishing (2023)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Preprints in Chemistry: a Research Team's Journey** (2022)The Transformation of the Green Road to Open Access (2023)Reproducibility in chemistry research (2024)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2016How open science helps researchers succeed790 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
  • 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services55 cited
  • 2018Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline37 cited
  • 2019Open science practices in clinical psychology journals: An audit study.35 cited
  • 2021Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication22 cited
  • 2022US government reveals big changes to open-access policy21 cited
  • 2023The growing role of social media for research and education in radiology18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work