Risk tolerance in youth with emerging mood disorders

Abstract

Abstract Reward-seeking behavior drives adolescents toward risky decision-making. As compared to their older and younger peers, adolescents experience higher rates of anxiety and depressive disorders, leading to impaired decision-making with negative consequences. At two time points, separated by 6–8 weeks, we measured risky and ambiguous choices concurrently with levels of dysregulated emotion for youth aged 16–25 (N = 30, mean age 19.22 years, 19 males) attending a youth mental health clinic. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (10 items) (K10), the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Adolescent (17 items) (QIDS-A17) specifically designed for youth, and the Somatic and Psychological Health Report (12 items) (SPHERE-12) questionnaires were used to evaluate participant’s self-reported anxiety and depression scores. Risk and ambiguity tolerance was calculated at the individual and group level. At baseline, 25 (83%) participants were rated as experiencing a mental health condition, and 15 (50%) rated high on all three psychological questionnaires combined, scoring “severely” depressed and “severely” anxious. At follow-up, 25 returning participants, 80% (N = 20) remained distressed, with 11 continuing to rate high on all psychological scores. In Session 1, participants had a mean of approximately 14 risky choices (SD = 4.6), and 11 ambiguous choices (SD = 7.6), whilst in Session 2, participants’ mean equated to approximately 13 ambiguous choices (SD = 8.5), but their risk increased to 15 choices (SD = 6.5). Applying a multiple regression analysis at the group level, the data suggests that participants were risk averse (α = 0.55, SE = 0.05), and preferred making ambiguous choices (β = 0.25, SE = 0.04). These results suggest that high trait-like anxiety in youth is associated with risk intolerance. These findings may have implications for screening young people with emerging mood disorders.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.