How do we Determine Content Boundaries in Systematic Review Studies of Management Research?

Mehmet Ali Köseoğlu · Hasan Evrim Arıcı

13 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Scientometric Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Business and Management Studies Business Strategies and Management Research

Abstract

Mehmet Ali Köseoglu and Hasan Evrim Arici Author informationPDFCitations 1Department of Management, College of Management, Metropolitan State University, 1501 Hennepin Ave., Minneapolis, MN, USA 2Faculty of Tourism, Kastamonu University, 37105 Kastamonu, TURKEY Corresponding author. Correspondence: Dr. Hasan Evrim Arici Asst. Prof. at the Faculty of Tourism, Kastamonu University, 37105, Kastamonu, TURKEY. Email: hasanevrimarici@yahoo.com ORCID: 0000-0003-3429-4513

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement 1995The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review 2019Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies

Cited by

2024Artificial intelligence ethics in services: are we paying attention to that?!

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.