SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Policy shaping the impact of open-access publications: a longitudinal assessment
16 references·0 citing·32 second hop
Policy shaping the impact of open-access publications: a longitudinal assessment (2023)Policy shaping the impact of open-access …Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Two new Later Stone Age sites…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Is the open access citation a…Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Scientific globalism during a global crisis: research collaboration and open access publications on COVID-19 (2020)Scientific globalism during a…Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment (2019)Google Scholar as a Data Sour…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Factors affecting number of c…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations (2013)How to evaluate individual re…A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)A study of open access journa…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Op…Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)Do open access articles have …Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions (2019)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research (2020)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2024Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal23,871 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,084 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2016Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature912 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 2010Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research602 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review559 cited
  • 2007Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature373 cited
  • 2012A study of open access journals using article processing charges358 cited
  • 2021Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles232 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Scientific globalism during a global crisis: research collaboration and open access publications on COVID-19195 cited
  • 2013How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations143 cited
  • 2019Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment143 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.