SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Leveraging the Potential of Generative AI to Accelerate Systematic Literature Reviews: An Example in the Area of Educational Technology
12 references·3 citing·47 second hop
Leveraging the Potential of Generative AI to Accelerate Systematic Literature Reviews: An Example in the Area of Educational Technology (2023)Leveraging the Potential of Generative AI…Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review (2023)Using ChatGPT to conduct a li…The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of disclosing the …Should Artificial Intelligent Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in Favour, Informed by ChatGPT (2023)Should Artificial Intelligent…Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if Ch…From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)From human writing to artific…Correction to: Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? (2023)Correction to: Can artificial…Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Chatting and cheating: Ensuri…ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive revi…ChatGPT for Research and Publication: Opportunities and Challenges (2023)ChatGPT for Research and Publ…ChatGPT and Publication Ethics (2023)ChatGPT and Publication EthicsA Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017)A Review of Self-regulated Le…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Generative artificial intelligence for literature reviews (2026)Generative artificial intelli…Human-centered AI: advancing ethical, transparent, and context-aware systems for sustainable development (2025)Human-centered AI: advancing …Comparing Generative AI Literature Reviews Versus Human-Led Systematic Literature Reviews: A Case Study on Big Data Research (2025)Comparing Generative AI Liter…Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. (1977)Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1999)Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses (2017)The Role of Direct Strategy Instruction and Indirect Activation of Self-Regulated Learning—Evidence from Classroom Observation Studies (2020)Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis (2021)ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances (2023)Using AI to write scholarly publications (2023)AI for social science and social science of AI: A survey (2024)ChatGPT in thematic analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research? (2025)GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences (2020)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work (2024)Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science (2021)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? (2023)The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: Students’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments (2024)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review (1989)Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (2002)Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research (2023)Employing large language models in survey research (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Research integrity in the era of artificial intelligence: Challenges and responses (2024)HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case (2019)Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence? (2023)How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? (2023)A multinational study on the factors influencing university students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT (2024)What is research collaboration? (1997)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Can we trust LLMs to help us? An examination of the potential use of GPT-4 in generating quality literature reviews (2024)Let stochastic parrots squawk: why academic journals should allow large language models to coauthor articles (2024)Reassessing the Constructs Related to Technology Adoption Theories in the Global Marketing Domain in Light of the Emergence of GenAI (2024)Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review (2024)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2023Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy4,557 cited
  • 2023Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT3,054 cited
  • 2017A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research2,899 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope2,455 cited
  • 2023From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing795 cited
  • 2023The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts264 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT and Publication Ethics158 cited
  • 2023Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review144 cited
  • 2023Should Artificial Intelligent Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in Favour, Informed by ChatGPT59 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT for Research and Publication: Opportunities and Challenges51 cited
  • 2023Correction to: Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?38 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Human-centered AI: advancing ethical, transparent, and context-aware systems for sustainable development

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

21 cited
  • 2025Comparing Generative AI Literature Reviews Versus Human-Led Systematic Literature Reviews: A Case Study on Big Data Research17 cited
  • 2026Generative artificial intelligence for literature reviews11 cited