SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Can ChatGPT and Other AI Bots Serve as Peer Reviewers?
6 references·3 citing·31 second hop
Can ChatGPT and Other AI Bots Serve as Peer Reviewers? (2023)Can ChatGPT and Other AI Bots Serve as Pe…Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Can Large Language Models Pro…Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threate…How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing (2023)How ChatGPT and other AI tool…ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on r…Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts (2023)Best Practices for Using AI W…AI et al.: Machines Are About to Change Scientific Publishing Forever (2023)AI et al.: Machines Are About…The assisted Technology dilemma: a reflection on AI chatbots use and risks while reshaping the peer review process in scientific research (2025)The assisted Technology dilem…Should We Publish Fewer Papers? (2024)Should We Publish Fewer Paper…Do you want your paper published? – Then referee others! The view from seasoned editors (2024)Do you want your paper publis…Could AI help you to write your next paper? (2022)AUTOGEN: A Personalized Large Language Model for Academic Enhancement—Ethics and Proof of Principle (2023)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)Understanding University Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 Model (2024)The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)Science communication with generative AI (2024)Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey (2025)Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers (2025)Bias in peer review (2012)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Art and the science of generative AI (2023)ChatGPT-supported collaborative argumentation: Integrating collaboration script and argument mapping to enhance EFL students’ argumentation skills (2024)The grass is not always greener: Teacher vs. GPT-assisted written corrective feedback (2024)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Scientific literature: Information overload (2016)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Should You Really be Writing A(nother) Review Manuscript? (2025)The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)Peer review: Troubled from the start (2016)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Towards a standard for identifying and managing bias in artificial intelligence (2022)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Recent Trend in Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Biomedical Publishing: A Quantitative Bibliometric Analysis (2023)AI vs academia: Experimental study on AI text detectors’ accuracy in behavioral health academic writing (2024)AI-induced emotions in L2 education: Exploring EFL students’ perceived emotions and regulation strategies (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
  • 2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
  • 2024Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis253 cited
  • 2023How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing120 cited
  • 2023Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts105 cited
  • 2023AI et al.: Machines Are About to Change Scientific Publishing Forever90 cited

Cited by

  • 2025The assisted Technology dilemma: a reflection on AI chatbots use and risks while reshaping the peer review process in scientific research28 cited
  • 2024Should We Publish Fewer Papers?17 cited
  • 2024Do you want your paper published? – Then referee others! The view from seasoned editors8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work