SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory (2023)An artificial intelligence tool misclassi…Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)Predatory publishing in Scopu…Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)Requiem for impact factors an…Does the Financial Times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals? (2021)Does the Financial Times FT50…Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)Continued use of retracted pa…An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)An integrated paradigm shift …Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)Problematizing ‘predatory pub…Power, Powerlessness, and Journal Ranking Lists: The Marginalization of Fields of Practice (2020)Power, Powerlessness, and Jou…How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)How reliable and useful is Ca…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Predatory Journals on Trial: Allegations, Responses, and Lessons for Scholarly Publishing from FTC v. OMICS (2019)Predatory Journals on Trial: …Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals (2018)Impact factor, eigenfactor, a…What I learned from predatory publishers (2017)What I learned from predatory…Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (2017)Suitability of Google Scholar…A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator (2012)A further step forward in mea…SCImago Journal & Country Rank (2008)SCImago Journal & Country RankCo‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures (1987)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis (2015)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Planning local economic development: theory and practice (2002)Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries (2012)Regression assumptions in clinical psychology research practice—a systematic review of common misconceptions (2017)Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics (2019)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison (2018)Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Big data and analytics in hospitality and tourism: a systematic literature review (2021)Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977)Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1978)The Logic of Practice (1990)Athena SWAN: “Institutional peacocking” in the neoliberal university (2022)Instrumentalism and the publish-or-perish regime (2022)Legitimacy Through Research, Not Rankings: A Provocation and Proposal for Business Schools (2023)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)Who Counts? (2023)Is circular economy a failing sustainability paradigm? Not necessarily (2025)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Automatic classification of citation function (2006)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report (2022)The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)Notes on CEPII’s Distances Measures: The GeoDist Database (2012)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)World Development Indicators (2017)Russian economic science on the international market of “predatory” publications (2021)Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (2023)Are open access fees a good use of taxpayers’ money? (2024)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,084 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2017Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature486 cited
  • 2012A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator405 cited
  • 2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
  • 2008SCImago Journal & Country Rank206 cited
  • 2020Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences123 cited
  • 2021Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine97 cited
  • 2022Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences70 cited
  • 2020Power, Powerlessness, and Journal Ranking Lists: The Marginalization of Fields of Practice59 cited
  • 2021Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges50 cited
  • 2021An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’47 cited
  • 2019Predatory Journals on Trial: Allegations, Responses, and Lessons for Scholarly Publishing from FTC v. OMICS41 cited
  • 2020How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

41 cited
  • 2018Impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, scopus SNIP, and SCImage journal rank of occupational therapy journals41 cited
  • 2021Does the Financial Times FT50 journal list select the best management and economics journals?38 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.