Articlegreen2023

Corporate sustainability, organizational resilience and corporate purpose: a triple concept for achieving long-term prosperity

María Paula Florez Jiménez · Álvaro Lleó · Ignacio Danvila del Valle · Gregorio Sánchez Marín

48 citations0/0 files storedManagement Decision

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Organizational Strategy and Culture Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Sustainability and Innovation in Business

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to narrow the gap caused by the lack of literature relating the three concepts of corporate sustainability, organizational resilience and corporate purpose in the context of corporations. A framework that explains how these three concepts are related and effectively merged for long-term corporate survival are proposed. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review is carried out. It is explained, first, initial search strategies to identify those documents that define each concept and to identify concepts with which each concept is associated. Subsequently, it is designed a search strategy combining all three concepts and their associated concepts to gather and analyze all the possible studies that have tried to connect these concepts. Finally, it is identified some gaps in the understanding of how these three concepts are related. Findings Results indicate that corporate sustainability, organizational resilience and corporate purpose merge to achieve long-term corporate survival. There exists a two-way relationship between these three variables. Findings also present gaps and future directions that should be addressed to foster an increase in knowledge about the relationships between corporate sustainability, organizational resilience and corporate purpose. Originality/value Nowadays, some authors endeavor to explain how aspects such as corporate sustainability, organizational resilience and corporate purpose are crucial in the dynamic environment facing corporations every day. Nevertheless, there needs to be more understanding of how these three concepts are related and effectively merged for long-term corporate survival. This paper contributes to the literature by closing this gap.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

References

2008From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis 2002Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability 2015The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context 2002The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior 2012Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda 2004Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet 2020Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research

Cited by

2024Integrating ESG and organisational resilience through system theory: the ESGOR matrix 2025Integrated Office Applications Promote the Sustainable Development of E-Commerce Enterprises: A Study Based on the TPB-TAM-IS Success Model 2026Social Innovations and Sustainable Development of Enterprises in Poland—The Social and Environmental Perspective of Generation Z

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.