SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessing the Quality of YouTube’s Incontinence Information after Cancer Surgery: An Innovative Graphical Analysis
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Assessing the Quality of YouTube’s Incontinence Information after Cancer Surgery: An Innovative Graphical Analysis (2024)Assessing the Quality of YouTube’s Incont…Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023)Fake news, disinformation and…What to watch: Practical considerations and strategies for using YouTube for research (2022)What to watch: Practical cons…Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform? (2022)Testicular cancer and YouTube…PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)PRISMA2020 : An R package and…Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer (2021)Reliability and Quality of Yo…Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation? (2021)Is YouTube a high-quality sou…YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content‐Quality and Reliability Analysis (2019)YouTube as a Source of Inform…Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube (2018)Evaluating the Accuracy and Q…Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation (2018)Correlation Coefficients: App…A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)A Guideline of Selecting and …Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review (2014)Healthcare information on You…Cancer Survivorship in the Age of YouTube and Social Media: A Narrative Analysis (2011)Cancer Survivorship in the Ag…YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information (2009)YouTube as Source of Prostate…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Correlation and Simple Linear Regression (2003)Correlation and Simple Linear…The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things (1904)Rank Correlation Methods. (1951)Rank Correlation Methods. (1957)Análise de correlação em estudos clínicos e experimentais (2018)A review of quantification methodologies for multi-hazard interrelationships (2019)Du-Bus: A Realtime Bus Waiting Time Estimation System Based On Multi-Source Data (2022)YouTube as a Source of Information on Immunization: A Content Analysis (2007)When Vaccines Go Viral: An Analysis of HPV Vaccine Coverage on YouTube (2011)YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis — A Wakeup Call? (2012)The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on food priorities. Results from a preliminary study using social media and an online survey with Spanish consumers (2020)Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review (2022)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors (1994)The Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS): A dynamic, multimodal set of facial and vocal expressions in North American English (2018)Intraclass correlation – A discussion and demonstration of basic features (2019)Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient (1988)Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. (2012)Sensitivity analysis methods in the biomedical sciences (2020)Conducting correlation analysis: important limitations and pitfalls (2021)Statistics From A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): A Guide to Interpreting Common Measures of Association, Agreement, Diagnostic Accuracy, Effect Size, Heterogeneity, and Reliability in Medical Research (2021)Is Content Really King? An Objective Analysis of the Public's Response to Medical Videos on YouTube (2013)Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube (2019)Social media in health communication: A literature review of information quality (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence in systematic reviews: promising when appropriately used (2023)Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making: A state-of-the-art research perspective using bibliometric analysis (2023)Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda (2025)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election (2017)The science of fake news (2018)The spread of true and false news online (2018)A multi-theoretical view on social media continuance intention: Combining theory of planned behavior, expectation-confirmation model and consumption values (2023)Human or machine? The perception of artificial intelligence in journalism, its socio-economic conditions, and technological developments toward the digital future (2023)Impact of digital technologies on manufacturing firm resilience during COVID-19 pandemic: a PLS-SEM and artificial neural network analysis (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2016A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research29,261 cited
  • 2018Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation10,949 cited
  • 2022PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis3,462 cited
  • 2014Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review1,291 cited
  • 2003Correlation and Simple Linear Regression1,096 cited
  • 2023Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review771 cited
  • 2018Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube467 cited
  • 2009YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information271 cited
  • 2011Cancer Survivorship in the Age of YouTube and Social Media: A Narrative Analysis219 cited
  • 2019YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content‐Quality and Reliability Analysis121 cited
  • 2022What to watch: Practical considerations and strategies for using YouTube for research60 cited
  • 2021Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

58 cited
  • 2022Testicular cancer and YouTube: What do you expect from a social media platform?43 cited
  • 2021Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer35 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.