References

• 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework454 cited
• 2015ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science179 cited
• 2015Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio85 cited
• 2016The LR does not exist60 cited
• 2016What should a forensic practitioner's likelihood ratio be?45 cited
• 2016Reframing the Debate: A Question of Probability, Not of Likelihood Ratio45 cited
• 2016Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate41 cited
• 2016An argument against presenting interval quantifications as a surrogate for the value of evidence24 cited
• 2019An introductory guide to evaluative reporting in forensic science23 cited
• 2016Admitting to uncertainty in the LR22 cited
• 2020The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases18 cited
• 2015Comment on ‘Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty on the assessment of a likelihood ratio’ by Taroni F., Bozza S., Biederman A. and Aitken C.14 cited
• 2016The evaluation of exclusionary DNA results: a discussion of issues inRv.Drummond13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.