The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research

Sirwan Khalid Ahmed

1,267 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Qualitative Research Methods and Applications Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics Data Analysis and Archiving

Abstract

The global medical and nursing research community has increasingly embraced qualitative research approaches, recognizing the additional benefits they provide to the investigation process. Qualitative research explores the intricate details of human behavior, attitudes, and experiences, emphasizing the exploration of nuances and context. Ensuring trustworthiness is crucial in establishing the credibility and reliability of qualitative findings. This includes elements such as credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Several papers have discussed concerns regarding the rigor of qualitative health services research and have provided guidelines and checklists for publishing and conducting qualitative research. The key criteria for ensuring the quality of qualitative research include credibility, achieved through extended involvement, persistent observation, and triangulation; transferability, achieved through comprehensive and detailed explanations; dependability, achieved through rigorous documentation and the creation of an audit trail; and confirmability, achieved through peer debriefing, member checking, and reflexive journaling. Establishing reliability in qualitative research is crucial for influencing future research paths and advancing cumulative knowledge. Trustworthy qualitative research findings are also important for informing policy decisions and improving the provision of services in various fields. While qualitative research has limitations, such as subjectivity and resource constraints, the methodical application of measures to ensure trustworthiness greatly enhances the precision and reliability of qualitative research. These measures also encourage transparency and critical evaluation by the scholarly community.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1,267 citations exist upstream.

References

1985Naturalistic inquiry 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups 2001Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines 2002Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research 1999Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.2002Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research 2020A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research 2010Presenting and Evaluating Qualitative Research

Cited by

2025Using thematic analysis in qualitative research 2024Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies 2024Comparing GPT-4 and Human Researchers in Health Care Data Analysis: Qualitative Description Study 2025Generative AI–Enabled Therapy Support Tool for Improved Clinical Outcomes and Patient Engagement in Group Therapy: Real-World Observational Study 2025A journey towards a trauma informed and responsive Justice system: the perspectives and experiences of senior Justice workers

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.