SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs to retrieve bibliographic data for evidence synthesis. A procedure based on Bash and SQL
14 references·3 citing·45 second hopsampled
Using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs to retrieve bibliographic data for evidence synthesis. A procedure based on Bash and SQL (2024)Using Scopus and OpenAlex APIs to retriev…Which of the metadata with relevance for bibliometrics are the same and which are different when switching from Microsoft Academic Graph to OpenAlex? (2023)Which of the metadata with re…OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts (2022)OpenAlex: A fully-open index …Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)How to conduct a bibliometric…Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses (2021)Guidance for using artificial…Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity (2020)Web of Science as a data sour…Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough (2020)Microsoft Academic Graph: Whe…Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data (2020)Dimensions: Bringing down bar…Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata (2020)Crossref: The sustainable sou…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options (2019)Systematic reviews of qualita…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations (2026)The OpenAlex database in revi…(Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex (2025)(Non-)retracted academic pape…AI-pocalypse now: Automating the systematic literature review with SPARK (Systematic processing and automated review Kit) – gathering, organising, filtering, and scaffolding. (2024)AI-pocalypse now: Automating …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Emergency remote teaching in higher education: mapping the first global online semester (2021)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? (2018)Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation (2018)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns (2015)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Distributional Structure (1954)2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (2013)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research (2022)Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review (2024)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)ArnetMiner (2008)Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholar (2018)OpenAIRE Graph Dataset (2019)The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing (2023)A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour (2024)The landscape of biomedical research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines18,918 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,745 cited
  • 2020Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity1,468 cited
  • 2022OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts1,248 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic1,106 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis647 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2020Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough553 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort359 cited
  • 2020Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data274 cited
  • 2020Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata186 cited
  • 2021Guidance for using artificial intelligence for title and abstract screening while conducting knowledge syntheses117 cited
  • 2019Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview of different methodological options58 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2023
Which of the metadata with relevance for bibliometrics are the same and which are different when switching from Microsoft Academic Graph to OpenAlex?
28 cited

Cited by

  • 2026The OpenAlex database in review: Evaluating its applications, capabilities, and limitations9 cited
  • 2025(Non-)retracted academic papers in OpenAlex7 cited
  • 2024AI-pocalypse now: Automating the systematic literature review with SPARK (Systematic processing and automated review Kit) – gathering, organising, filtering, and scaffolding.5 cited