SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg?
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg? (2024)Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evalua…Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threate…The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)The manifold costs of being a…Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Comparing scientific abstract…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an au…AI-assisted peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer reviewOpen peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Open peer review: promoting t…Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem (2019)Plagiarism detectors are a cr…What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? (2017)Using Internet based paraphra…Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers (2017)Survey on open peer review: A…Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? (2017)Can editors save peer review …Reviewing post-publication peer review (2015)Reviewing post-publication pe…Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors (2015)Ensuring the Quality, Fairnes…Plagiarism in research (2014)Plagiarism in researchJournals step up plagiarism policing (2010)Journals step up plagiarism p…Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing (2006)Avoiding plagiarism, self-pla…Conditioned emotional reactions. (1920)The Craft of Research (1997)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Ethics and scientific publication (2005)Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice (2013)Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment (2013)Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty (1995)The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers (2006)Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education (2013)Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review (2022)Decoding Academic Integrity Policies: A Corpus Linguistics Investigation of AI and Other Technological Threats (2023)Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education (2024)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)The ups and downs of peer review (2007)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)The state of the art in peer review (2018)Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science (2019)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive (2022)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance (2023)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences (2020)Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology (2021)How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing (2023)Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary? (2025)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text (2023)Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
  • 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
  • 2023Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use604 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2023The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science412 cited
  • 2021AI-assisted peer review284 cited
  • 2006Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing255 cited
  • 2017Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers243 cited
  • 2017Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism?179 cited
  • 2020Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science167 cited
  • 2015Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors161 cited
  • 2014Plagiarism in research115 cited
  • 2010Journals step up plagiarism policing96 cited
  • 2017Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?80 cited
  • 2019Plagiarism detectors are a crutch, and a problem

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

78 cited
  • 2015Reviewing post-publication peer review73 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.