SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Structured success: Study protocols and preregistration in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Structured success: Study protocols and preregistration in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation (2024)Structured success: Study protocols and p…Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation (2023)Checklists, risk of bias tool…Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine (2022)Why there is a need to improv…Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2021)Author guidelines for conduct…A historical review of publication bias (2020)A historical review of public…When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress (2017)When Does HARKing Hurt? Ident…When are clinical trials registered? An analysis of prospective versus retrospective registration (2016)When are clinical trials regi…Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning (2016)Prevention of selective outco…Harking, Sharking, and Tharking (2016)Harking, Sharking, and Tharki…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review (2012)Guidelines for randomized cli…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A power primer. (1992)Sensemaking in Organizations (1996)Understanding “It Depends” in Organizational Research (2017)State Ownership and Political Connections (2019)Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1970)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation (2021)Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society (2021)Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database (2025)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Single-Case-Design Research in Special Education: Next-Generation Guidelines and Considerations (2022)Conducting Meta-analyses of Proportions in R (2023)ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2023)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2016Harking, Sharking, and Tharking222 cited
  • 2017When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress181 cited
  • 2020A historical review of publication bias165 cited
  • 2016When are clinical trials registered? An analysis of prospective versus retrospective registration104 cited
  • 2021Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses86 cited
  • 2012Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review81 cited
  • 2023Checklists, risk of bias tools, and reporting guidelines for research in orthopedics, sports medicine, and rehabilitation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

65 cited
  • 2016Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning32 cited
  • 2022Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine29 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.