SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific Manuscript Accepted
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific Manuscript Accepted (2024)Ten Ways to Improve Getting a Scientific …A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine (2020)A brief guide to the science …Scientific sinkhole: The pernicious price of formatting (2019)Scientific sinkhole: The pern…A consensus-based transparency checklist (2019)A consensus-based transparenc…Steps to Getting Your Manuscript Published in a High-Quality Medical Journal (2018)Steps to Getting Your Manuscr…Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology (2018)Guidelines for Reporting of S…Statistical Data Editing in Scientific Articles (2017)Statistical Data Editing in S…Ethical guidelines for publishing in the journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle: update 2017 (2017)Ethical guidelines for publis…You are invited to submit… (2015)You are invited to submit…Statistical and data reporting guidelines for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery (2015)Statistical and data reportin…Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Recommendations for the condu…Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal (2012)Why do you think you should b…Prevalence of Honorary Coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology (2012)Prevalence of Honorary Coauth…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence' (2009)Extending an evidence hierarc…Basic structure and types of scientific papers. (2008)Basic structure and types of …How to write a paper for publication (2000)How to write a paper for publ…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)Open Education Science (2018)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology (2015)Systematic review and economic modelling of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of art therapy among people with non-psychotic mental health disorders (2015)Establishing and Governing e-Mental Health Care in Australia: A Systematic Review of Challenges and A Call For Policy-Focussed Research (2016)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines (2020)The OHStat Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies and Clinical Trials in Oral Health Research: Manuscript Checklist (2024)How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers (1997)Dynamic eco-efficiency evaluation of the semiconductor industry: a sustainable development perspective (2019)Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers (2021)Personalised Recommendations in Mental Health Apps: The Impact of Autonomy and Data Sharing (2021)Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective (2006)Ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle (2010)Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2015 (2015)Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2019 (2019)The Difference in Referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2019)Ethical guidelines for publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle: update 2021 (2021)Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines (2014)PRESENT 2020: Text Expanding on the Checklist for Proper Reporting of Evidence in Sport and Exercise Nutrition Trials (2020)A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration (2021)CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers: the CHAMP statement (2021)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science (2021)Pravila PRISMA 2020. (2021)Video game play is positively correlated with well-being (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Creating Logical Flow When Writing Scientific Articles (2021)PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration (2023)Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (2024)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)The AASPIRE practice-based guidelines for the inclusion of autistic adults in research as co-researchers and study participants (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2015Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals739 cited
  • 2009Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'435 cited
  • 2017Ethical guidelines for publishing in the journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle: update 2017351 cited
  • 2018Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology334 cited
  • 2015Statistical and data reporting guidelines for the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery and the Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery221 cited
  • 2019A consensus-based transparency checklist151 cited
  • 2015You are invited to submit…114 cited
  • 2017Statistical Data Editing in Scientific Articles105 cited
  • 2020A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine50 cited
  • 2000How to write a paper for publication44 cited
  • 2008Basic structure and types of scientific papers.42 cited
  • 2012Prevalence of Honorary Coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology40 cited
  • 2018Steps to Getting Your Manuscript Published in a High-Quality Medical Journal37 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Scientific sinkhole: The pernicious price of formatting
36 cited
  • 2012Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal32 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.