SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Against “silent” retractions in neuroscience
13 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Against “silent” retractions in neuroscience (2024)Against “silent” retractions in neuroscie…Review of retracted papers in the field of neurology (2023)Review of retracted papers in…Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Publication and collaboration…Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review (2022)Threats to scholarly research…The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review (2022)The Role of Publons in the Co…Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction (2022)Non‐author entities accountab…Clarifying knowledge withholding: A systematic literature review and future research agenda (2022)Clarifying knowledge withhold…A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)A Synthesis of the Formats fo…The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation (2021)The right to refuse unwanted …Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness (2021)Fortification of retraction n…Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations (2020)Silently withdrawn or retract…Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (2019)Handbook of Research Ethics a…Silent or Stealth Retractions, the Dangerous Voices of the Unknown, Deleted Literature (2015)Silent or Stealth Retractions…Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: Guidance from th…Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science (2017)Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method (2019)A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations (2023)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction (2021)Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions (2023)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies (2017)Reform retractions to make them more transparent (2020)Study of the Causes and Consequences of Cloned Journal Publications (2022)t-index: entropy based random document and citation analysis using average h-index (2022)Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology (2025)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)Journal of Global Health’s Guidelines for Reporting Analyses of Big Data Repositories Open to the Public (GRABDROP): preventing ‘paper mills’, duplicate publications, misuse of statistical inference, and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence (2025)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The natural selection of bad science (2016)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses (2023)The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review (2023)The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review (2024)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Are lessons being learnt from the replication crisis or will the revolution devour its children? Open Q science from the editor's perspective (2024)Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg? (2024)No reward without responsibility: Focus on peer review reports (2024)Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. (1989)Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. (2001)“You reap what you sow”: unraveling the determinants of knowledge hoarding behavior using a three-wave study (2023)When does knowledge hiding hinder employees’ job performance? The roles of emotional exhaustion and emotional intelligence (2023)Innovations in Healthcare: A systematic literature review (2025)An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing (2012)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future (2024)‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research (2025)Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing (2022)Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)Context and Its Complications (2020)Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (2020)Multimodality (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill101 cited
  • 2019Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity80 cited
  • 2022Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: a rapid scoping review70 cited
  • 2009Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)67 cited
  • 2022A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges51 cited
  • 2021Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness46 cited
  • 2015Silent or Stealth Retractions, the Dangerous Voices of the Unknown, Deleted Literature38 cited
  • 2022Clarifying knowledge withholding: A systematic literature review and future research agenda38 cited
  • 2022The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review37 cited
  • 2021The right to refuse unwanted citations: rethinking the culture of science around the citation37 cited
  • 2020Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations28 cited
  • 2022Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction28 cited
  • 2023Review of retracted papers in the field of neurology23 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.