SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The fading of status bias during the open peer review process
16 references·0 citing·45 second hop
The fading of status bias during the open peer review process (2024)The fading of status bias during the open…Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Tracking the popularity and o…The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)The effect of publishing peer…A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)A standardized citation metri…The Matthew effect in science funding (2018)The Matthew effect in science…Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Reviewer bias in single- vers…tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R (2016)tidytext: Text Mining and Ana…The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)The Effects of Double-Blind v…Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige (2016)Single-blind vs Double-blind …Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Coauthorship within the United States (2015)Collaborating with People Lik…Page Limits on Economics Articles: Evidence from Two Journals (2014)Page Limits on Economics Arti…Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…Bias in peer review (2012)Bias in peer reviewCitations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features (2009)Citations to scientific artic…Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmask…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Does Masking Author Identity …Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks (2001)The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade (2004)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Journals invite too few women to referee (2017)What Does Homophily Do? A Review of the Consequences of Homophily (2021)Intersectional inequalities in science (2022)Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as Social Knowledge (1990)A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (1994)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)Text Mining Infrastructure in R (2008)Text Analysis in R (2017)quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data (2018)Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents – A Scoping Review (2020)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions (2019)Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions (2021)Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention (2022)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty: Comment (2004)Systemic and Reflexive: Foundations of Cumulative Dis/Advantage and Life-Course Processes (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Global citation inequality is on the rise (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices (2015)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators (2020)Robust Bayesian meta‐analysis: Model‐averaging across complementary publication bias adjustment methods (2022)Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market (1999)Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians (2000)Women in Academic Science (2014)Testing and adjusting for publication bias (2001)A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors (2006)Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors (2007)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Bias in peer review997 cited
  • 2016tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R947 cited
  • 2018The Matthew effect in science funding636 cited
  • 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review605 cited
  • 2016The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review425 cited
  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 2019A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field356 cited
  • 2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
  • 2015Collaborating with People Like Me: Ethnic Coauthorship within the United States326 cited
  • 1998Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review281 cited
  • 1998Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?278 cited
  • 2019The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals276 cited
  • 2019Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints196 cited
  • 2016Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige192 cited
  • 2009Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

179 cited
  • 2014Page Limits on Economics Articles: Evidence from Two Journals163 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.