SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers
16 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers (2024)Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Power failure: why small samp…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Publication Manual of the Ame…False-Positive Psychology (2011)False-Positive PsychologyThe Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…The American Psychological Association (1919)The American Psychological As…Perceptions of open access publishing: A comparative study of gold and diamond models among global researchers (2025)Perceptions of open access pu…A Ten-Year Scoping Review of Qualitative Research on Online Psychoeducational, Counseling, and Therapy Groups (2025)A Ten-Year Scoping Review of …Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). (1996)On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. (2002)Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. (2011)The New Statistics (2013)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper (2017)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Sample Size Justification (2022)Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales (1998)ArXiv.org e-print archive (2004)Sleeping Beauties in science (2004)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The preregistration revolution (2018)The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use (2019)Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? (1995)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities (2014)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output12,131 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2013Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience7,634 cited
  • 1919The American Psychological Association7,475 cited
  • 2011False-Positive Psychology6,587 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,536 cited
  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,780 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,692 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics3,281 cited
  • 2011Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association3,178 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,923 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,380 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories2,343 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison2,024 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,578 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,486 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Perceptions of open access publishing: A comparative study of gold and diamond models among global researchers10 cited
    • 2025A Ten-Year Scoping Review of Qualitative Research on Online Psychoeducational, Counseling, and Therapy Groups1 cited