SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation and Comparison of Academic Impact and Disruptive Innovation Level of Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis and Disruptive Evaluation
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Evaluation and Comparison of Academic Impact and Disruptive Innovation Level of Medical Journals: Bibliometric Analysis and Disruptive Evaluation (2024)Evaluation and Comparison of Academic Imp…Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Papers and patents are becomi…Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)Citation counts and journal i…Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science (2021)Slowed canonical progress in …Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers (2020)Are disruption index indicato…Arbitrariness in the peer review process (2020)Arbitrariness in the peer rev…Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations (2019)Software review: COCI, the Op…Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)Large teams develop and small…A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change (2016)A Dynamic Network Measure of …Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not? (2015)Editors’ JIF-boosting stratag…Ranking Games (2014)Ranking GamesWhat do the scientists think about the impact factor? (2012)What do the scientists think …Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity (2005)Disruptiveness of innovations…Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals (1995)Impact factor as a misleading…Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments (1986)Technological Discontinuities…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)De-segmenting research in entrepreneurial finance (2016)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)How to avoid borrowed plumes in academia (2019)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. (1988)The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions* (2005)How social capital and knowledge affect innovation (2011)Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? (2013)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)The Population Ecology of Organizations (1977)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories (1982)Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments (1984)Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (1985)Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change (1990)Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation (1991)An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. (1983)A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations (1990)Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search (2001)Women are credited less in science than men (2022)Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning (1991)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Evolutionary dynamics of higher-order interactions in social networks (2021)Social physics (2022)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Gendered citation practices in the field of communication (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Flat teams drive scientific innovation (2022)Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science (2023)SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research (2023)Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)What drives the relevance and reputation of economics journals? An update from a survey among economists (2015)Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (2020)Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas (2023)Serious Games and Gamification in Healthcare: A Meta-Review (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments6,124 cited
  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2019Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology1,040 cited
  • 2023Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time896 cited
  • 2016A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change498 cited
  • 2005Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity410 cited
  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations357 cited
  • 2021Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science318 cited
  • 2014Ranking Games134 cited
  • 2015Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not?128 cited
  • 2022Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences123 cited
  • 1995Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals119 cited
  • 2012What do the scientists think about the impact factor?114 cited
  • 2020Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers99 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations
90 cited
  • 2020Arbitrariness in the peer review process82 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.