SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Decoding the nuances of scholarly output and publication metrics in orthodontics
16 references·1 citing·57 second hopsampled
Decoding the nuances of scholarly output and publication metrics in orthodontics (2024)Decoding the nuances of scholarly output …The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods (2021)The production of scientific …Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)Problematizing ‘predatory pub…Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Open peer review: promoting t…Social media engagement behavior (2019)Social media engagement behav…Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Scholarly use of social media…The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (2016)The false academy: predatory …The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories (2016)Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Vi…Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science (2014)Scientific Outreach: Toward E…Bibliometric fingerprints: name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps (2010)Bibliometric fingerprints: na…Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Comparison of SCImago journal…Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi‐discipline exploratory analysis (2007)Google Scholar citations and …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Journal impact factor: a brie…Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research (1998)Citation rates and journal im…The evolution of orthodontic literature through journals: a century of paradigm shifts, globalization, and digitalization (2025)The evolution of orthodontic …Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)The skewness of science (1992)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Choosing Physiology Journals. (1944)Which Medical Journals Have the Greatest Impact? (1986)journal impact factors (1998)Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales (1998)ArXiv.org e-print archive (2004)Sleeping Beauties in science (2004)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019 (2020)Internet encyclopaedias go head to head (2005)Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship (2007)Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media (2009)Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data (2018)Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (2019)Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis (2021)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)The Role of Social Media Content Format and Platform in Users’ Engagement Behavior (2020)“Stop the unattainable ideal for an ordinary me!” fostering parasocial relationships with social media influencers: The role of self-discrepancy (2021)Why do consumers buy impulsively during live streaming? A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis (2022)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive (2022)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)The Intellectual and Social Organization Of the Sciences (2000)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output12,131 cited
  • 1999Journal impact factor: a brief review.760 cited
  • 2017Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature680 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review629 cited
  • 2008Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor586 cited
  • 2019Social media engagement behavior524 cited
  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level507 cited
  • 1998Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research238 cited
  • 2007Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi‐discipline exploratory analysis210 cited
  • 2020Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science167 cited
  • 2014Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biological Science166 cited
  • 2016The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics155 cited
  • 2016Interpreting ‘Altmetrics’: Viewing Acts on Social Media through the Lens of Citation and Social Theories139 cited
  • 2021The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods133 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Bibliometric fingerprints: name disambiguation based on approximate structure equivalence of cognitive maps124 cited
  • 2020Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences123 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025The evolution of orthodontic literature through journals: a century of paradigm shifts, globalization, and digitalization5 cited