SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Recent trends: Retractions of articles in the oncology field
13 references·1 citing·40 second hop
Recent trends: Retractions of articles in the oncology field (2024)Recent trends: Retractions of articles in…Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers (2023)Scientific sleuths spot disho…Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers (2023)Passive Contribution of ChatG…More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)More than 10,000 research pap…How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing (2023)How ChatGPT and other AI tool…Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey (2022)Analysis of Retracted Publica…Journal Retractions in Oncology: A Bibliometric Study (2019)Journal Retractions in Oncolo…The new watchdogs’ vision of science: A roundtable with Ivan Oransky ( Retraction Watch ) and Brandon Stell ( PubPeer ) (2018)The new watchdogs’ vision of …Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)Retractions in cancer researc…Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016) (2017)Lack of Improvement in Scient…The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations (2014)The ethics of scholarly publi…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: Guidance from th…Retraction rates are on the rise (2008)Retraction rates are on the r…Analysis of Retracted Publications on Artificial Intelligence: Trends, Ethical Concerns, and Scientific Integrity (2025)Analysis of Retracted Publica…Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)What Studies of Retractions Tell Us (2014)An empirical analysis of differences in plagiarism among world cultures (2018)Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science (2017)Post retraction citations among manuscripts reporting a radiology-imaging diagnostic method (2019)A systematic review of retractions in biomedical research publications: reasons for retractions and their citations in Indian affiliations (2023)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians (2018)Analysis of retractions in Indian science (2019)Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018 (2019)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature (2021)Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science (2024)The Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials (2024)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Analysis of Retracted Publications in Medical Literature Due to Ethical Violations (2023)Characteristics of Retracted Publications From Kazakhstan: An Analysis Using the Retraction Watch Database (2023)Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years (2024)The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)Autonomous LLM-Driven Research — from Data to Human-Verifiable Research Papers (2024)Science communication with generative AI (2024)Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers (2025)Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals (2018)Linguistic positivity bias in academic writing: A large-scale diachronic study in life sciences across 50 years (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2023More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record354 cited
  • 2008Retraction rates are on the rise149 cited
  • 2023How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing120 cited
  • 2014The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations107 cited
  • 2017Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016)106 cited
  • 2017Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey83 cited
  • 2009Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)67 cited
  • 2019Journal Retractions in Oncology: A Bibliometric Study38 cited
  • 2022Analysis of Retracted Publications in The Biomedical Literature from Turkey36 cited
  • 2023Scientific sleuths spot dishonest ChatGPT use in papers35 cited
  • 2023Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers23 cited
  • 2018The new watchdogs’ vision of science: A roundtable with Ivan Oransky ( Retraction Watch ) and Brandon Stell ( PubPeer )22 cited

Cited by

  • 2025Analysis of Retracted Publications on Artificial Intelligence: Trends, Ethical Concerns, and Scientific Integrity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited