SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The dark side of publishing: Unveiling the deceptive tactics of cloned journals in India
16 references·0 citing·29 second hop
The dark side of publishing: Unveiling the deceptive tactics of cloned journals in India (2024)The dark side of publishing: Unveiling th…Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences (2020)Problematizing ‘predatory pub…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Why do authors publish in predatory journals? (2018)Why do authors publish in pre…Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)Predatory journals: Who publi…Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2018)Journal of the Association fo…How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)How predatory journals leak i…English as the lingua franca of international publishing (2018)English as the lingua franca …Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’ (2017)Time to stop talking about ‘p…Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals (2017)Ethical issues in publishing …Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures (2015)Predatory journals and the br…Firm action needed on predatory journals (2015)Firm action needed on predato…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…Predatory journals and their article publishing charges (2014)Predatory journals and their …Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers (2013)Medical Publishing Triage - C…Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)Investigating journals: The d…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. (1992)Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1993)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior (2021)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation (1991)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2010)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)A Bibliometric Analysis: A Tutorial for the Bibliometrix Package in R Using IRT Literature (2022)Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation (2017)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis (2017)The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects (2018)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2018Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology911 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2013Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing349 cited
  • 2018Why do authors publish in predatory journals?257 cited
  • 2018Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?245 cited
  • 2015Firm action needed on predatory journals242 cited
  • 2018How predatory journals leak into PubMed142 cited
  • 2013Medical Publishing Triage - Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers125 cited
  • 2020Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences123 cited
  • 2017Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’105 cited
  • 2017Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals97 cited
  • 2018English as the lingua franca of international publishing79 cited
  • 2014Predatory journals and their article publishing charges73 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015
Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures
73 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.