SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The conversational AI “ChatGPT” outperforms medical students on a physiology university examination
7 references·0 citing·30 second hop
The conversational AI “ChatGPT” outperforms medical students on a physiology university examination (2024)The conversational AI “ChatGPT” outperfor…Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection (2023)Will ChatGPT get you caught? …Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance (2023)Use of ChatGPT in academia: A…ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on r…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an au…ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances (2023)ChatGPT in scientific and aca…ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool? (2023)ChatGPT for academic writing:…AI, biometric analysis, and emerging cheating detection systems: The engineering of academic integrity? (2022)AI, biometric analysis, and e…Algorithms, Governance, and Governmentality (2015)The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior (2017)Where fairness fails: data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse (2019)Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Cheating (2024)Exploring the Dark Side of Online Distance Learning: Cheating Behaviours, Contributing Factors, and Strategies to Enhance the Integrity of Online Assessment (2024)Cheating Detection in Online Exams Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning (2025)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)New recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: use of artificial intelligence (2023)Accelerating research processes with Scopus AI: A place branding case study (2024)Can we trust academic AI detective? Accuracy and limitations of AI-output detectors (2025)ChatGPT Goes to Law School (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review (2023)An integrative decision-making framework to guide policies on regulating ChatGPT usage (2024)Thematic Analysis through Artificial Intelligence (AI) (2024)Wind of change: how ChatGPT and big data can reshape the knowledge management paradigm? (2024)Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error (1981)Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (2003)User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1 (2003)Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator (2023)ChatGPT adoption and anxiety: a cross-country analysis utilising the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) (2024)GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI (2024)ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? (2023)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology (2023)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)Effective or ineffective? Using ChatGPT for staffing in the hospitality industry (2023)Automated Detection of AI-Obfuscated Plagiarism in Modeling Assignments (2024)From Chat To Cheat: the Disruptive Effects of ChatGPT and Academic Integrity in Hong Kong Higher Education (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove868 cited
  • 2023Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance391 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT in scientific and academic research: future fears and reassurances110 cited
  • 2023Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection49 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool?40 cited
  • 2022AI, biometric analysis, and emerging cheating detection systems: The engineering of academic integrity?39 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work