SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review
16 references·3 citing·47 second hop
The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review (2024)The undeclared use of third-party service…Who wrote this? Essay mills and assessment – Considerations regarding contract cheating and AI in higher education (2023)Who wrote this? Essay mills a…Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles (2023)Using ChatGPT for language ed…The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of disclosing the …Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)Risks of abuse of large langu…Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science (2023)Leakage and the reproducibili…Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review (2023)Article processing charges fo…Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)Retracted papers originating …The raw truth about paper mills (2021)The raw truth about paper mil…The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The fight against fake-paper …When institutional logics meet: Alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners (2020)When institutional logics mee…Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Digital magic, or the dark ar…Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories (2019)Intellectual contributions me…The infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites (2018)The infernal business of cont…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies (2016)Publish or Perish mantra in t…Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science (2015)Linguistic Obfuscation in Fra…The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia (2025)The publish or perish, publis…The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature (2025)The Citation of Retracted Pap…A Free Comment Forum to Mitigate Epistemic Injustice in Academic Publication (2025)A Free Comment Forum to Mitig…Accuracy of Deception Judgments (2006)Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence (2008)The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods (2009)Using Named Entities for Computer‐Automated Verbal Deception Detection (2017)Barriers to innovation and knowledge generation: The challenges of conducting business and social research in an emerging country context (2018)TI-CNN: Convolutional Neural Networks for Fake News Detection (2018)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Value creation in E‐business (2001)Plagiarism—a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach (2005)The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research (2009)Why do postgraduate students commit plagiarism? An empirical study (2018)Academic Integrity Policies of Publicly Funded Universities in Western Canada (2020)Contract cheating in higher education: a systematic literature review and future research agenda (2021)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Publish or impoverish (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)China bans cash rewards for publishing papers (2020)Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)The landscape of biomedical research (2024)Using large language models to generate silicon samples in consumer and marketing research: Challenges, opportunities, and guidelines (2024)A Cross Sectional Study of ChatGPT in Translation: Magnitude of Use, Attitudes, and Uncertainties (2023)ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education: a media discourse analysis (2023)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Potential Roles of Large Language Models in the Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (2024)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review (2024)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine researchers’ practices and perceived barriers related to open science: An international, cross-sectional survey (2024)How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? (2025)Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023 (2025)Prediction and explanation in social systems (2017)Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science (2021)Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science? (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)REFORMS: Consensus-based Recommendations for Machine-learning-based Science (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Leakage and the reproducibility crisis in machine-learning-based science1,313 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2023The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts264 cited
  • 2021The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science251 cited
  • 2022Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study156 cited
  • 2023Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles139 cited
  • 2020Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?133 cited
  • 2015Linguistic Obfuscation in Fraudulent Science113 cited
  • 2018The infernal business of contract cheating: understanding the business processes and models of academic custom writing sites109 cited
  • 2023Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review105 cited
  • 2023Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills100 cited
  • 2021The raw truth about paper mills99 cited
  • 2023Who wrote this? Essay mills and assessment – Considerations regarding contract cheating and AI in higher education98 cited
  • 2016Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

94 cited
  • 2019Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories73 cited
  • 2020When institutional logics meet: Alignment and misalignment in collaboration between academia and practitioners72 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025The publish or perish, publish and perish, publish then perish, and now retract and perish cultures in academia15 cited
    • 2025The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature14 cited
    • 2025A Free Comment Forum to Mitigate Epistemic Injustice in Academic Publication8 cited