SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improvements Are Needed in the Adherence to the TRIPOD Statement for Clinical Prediction Models for Patients With Spinal Pain or Osteoarthritis: A Metaresearch Study
15 references·0 citing·40 second hopsampled
Improvements Are Needed in the Adherence to the TRIPOD Statement for Clinical Prediction Models for Patients With Spinal Pain or Osteoarthritis: A Metaresearch Study (2024)Improvements Are Needed in the Adherence …Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations (2023)Reporting guidelines used var…Increased endorsement of TRIPOD and other reporting guidelines by high impact factor journals: survey of instructions to authors (2023)Increased endorsement of TRIP…Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review (2022)Completeness of reporting of …Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study (2022)Completeness of Reporting Is …Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study (2022)Adherence to the PRISMA state…Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved (2021)Reporting of prognostic clini…Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence (2021)Protocol for development of a…Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: A systematic review (2021)Completeness of reporting of …Declaration of use and appropriate use of reporting guidelines in high-impact rehabilitation journals is limited: a meta-research study (2020)Declaration of use and approp…Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies (2019)Uniformity in measuring adher…Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers (2018)Reporting guidelines: doing b…Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research (2017)Guidelines for reporting meta…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Transparent Reporting of a mu…Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User’s Manual (2015)Guidelines for Reporting Heal…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods (2024)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect (2017)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Assessment of publication bias and outcome reporting bias in systematic reviews of health services and delivery research: A meta-epidemiological study (2020)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)Review of study reporting guidelines for clinical studies using artificial intelligence in healthcare (2021)Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Modeling Studies: Development and Validation (2023)Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care—the CRISP Statement (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Reporting guideline checklists are not quality evaluation forms: they are guidance for writing (2020)TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models (2020)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement (2015)APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support (2023)Evaluating the effectiveness of large language models in abstract screening: a comparative analysis (2024)Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in regional anesthesia and pain medicine (Part I): guidelines for preparing the review protocol (2023)Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Part I): Guidelines for Preparing the Review Protocol (2023)Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update (2024)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)The PRISMATIC project: protocol for a research programme on novel methods to improve reporting and peer review of systematic reviews of health evidence (2023)Methods used to develop the SPIRIT 2024 and CONSORT 2024 Statements (2024)Improving the Reporting on Health Equity in Observational Research (STROBE-Equity) (2025)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Reporting and risk of bias of prediction models based on machine learning methods in preterm birth: A systematic review (2022)Reproducibility of prediction models in health services research (2022)Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review (2023)TRIPOD+AI: an updated reporting guideline for clinical prediction models (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2015Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration5,114 cited
  • 2021Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence851 cited
  • 2017Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research514 cited
  • 2022Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review126 cited
  • 2019Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies112 cited
  • 2021Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved110 cited
  • 2018Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers106 cited
  • 2023Reporting guidelines used varying methodology to develop recommendations59 cited
  • 2022Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study53 cited
  • 2015Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User’s Manual33 cited
  • 2022Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study32 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Declaration of use and appropriate use of reporting guidelines in high-impact rehabilitation journals is limited: a meta-research study20 cited
  • 2023Increased endorsement of TRIPOD and other reporting guidelines by high impact factor journals: survey of instructions to authors15 cited
  • 2021Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: A systematic review14 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.