SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Challenges Facing Scientific Publishing in the Field of Earth & Space Sciences
10 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Challenges Facing Scientific Publishing in the Field of Earth & Space Sciences (2024)Challenges Facing Scientific Publishing i…Paper trail (2024)Paper trailMapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers (2024)Mapping the Increasing Use of…Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Papers and patents are becomi…More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)More than 10,000 research pap…Perceived publication pressure and research misconduct: should we be too bothered with a causal relationship? (2022)Perceived publication pressur…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Steps to improve gender diversity in coastal geoscience and engineering (2018)Steps to improve gender diver…Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Modelling science trustworthi…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Publish or perish: Where are we heading? (2014)Publish or perish: Where are …We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research (2010)Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review (2018)The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials (2019)HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: (1990)The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (2008)Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (2012)A Global Survey on the Perceptions and Impacts of Gender Inequality in the Earth and Space Sciences (2019)Hostile climates are barriers to diversifying the geosciences (2020)Breaking down barriers: The identification of actions to promote gender equality in interdisciplinary marine research institutions (2022)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Interventions to reduce partisan animosity (2022)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Beyond Beall’s List: Better understanding predatory publishers (2015)Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)A walk on the wild side: ‘Predatory’ journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations (2018)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Beyond the traditional: Extending academic libraries’ roles in research integrity based on the causes of research misconduct (2024)Deficient epistemic virtues and prevalence of epistemic vices as precursors to transgressions in research misconduct (2024)Publication pressure in medical imaging (2024)Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments (1986)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Serious Games and Gamification in Healthcare: A Meta-Review (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comprehensive step-by-step guide (2024)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)Science map of academic misconduct (2024)Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study (2025)Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study (2026)Estimating the use of ChatGPT in dental research publications (2024)Maintaining research integrity in the age of GenAI: an analysis of ethical challenges and recommendations to researchers (2025)The role of generative AI in academic and scientific authorship: an autopoietic perspective (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time1,027 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence837 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management634 cited
  • 2014Publish or perish: Where are we heading?386 cited
  • 2023More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record375 cited
  • 2018Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure225 cited
  • 2018Steps to improve gender diversity in coastal geoscience and engineering70 cited
  • 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers54 cited
  • 2024Paper trail35 cited
  • 2022Perceived publication pressure and research misconduct: should we be too bothered with a causal relationship?14 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work