SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ethics and Academic Discourse, Scientific Integrity, Uncertainty, and Disinformation in Medicine: An American College of Physicians Position Paper
8 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Ethics and Academic Discourse, Scientific Integrity, Uncertainty, and Disinformation in Medicine: An American College of Physicians Position Paper (2024)Ethics and Academic Discourse, Scientific…The Landscape of Medical Literature in the Era of COVID-19: Original Research Versus Opinion Pieces (2020)The Landscape of Medical Lite…Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists (2020)Backlash Over Meat Dietary Re…An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19 (2020)An Assessment of the Rapid De…Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium (2019)Scientific Integrity Principl…Evidence reversal—when new evidence contradicts current claims: a systematic overview review of definitions and terms (2017)Evidence reversal—when new ev…Self-correction in science at work (2015)Self-correction in science at…Online Medical Professionalism: Patient and Public Relationships: Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards (2013)Online Medical Professionalis…Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse (2010)Arguing to Learn in Science: …Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1964)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. (1965)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism (2016)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science (2021)The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence. (1958)Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses (1998)Drawing to Learn in Science (2011)Transformational Teaching: Theoretical Underpinnings, Basic Principles, and Core Methods (2012)Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities (2015)The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical Professionalism (2008)Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical Students (2009)Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices (2014)Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare (2015)Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples (2019)Factors associated with successful publication for systematic review protocol registration: an analysis of 397 registered protocols (2023)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices (2020)Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach (2020)Beyond nutrition and physical activity: food industry shaping of the very principles of scientific integrity (2021)Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors (2003)Repetitive, Duplicate, and Redundant Publications: A Review for Authors and Readers (2006)Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study (2019)A systematic bias assessment of top-cited full-length original clinical investigations related to COVID-19 (2021)Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model (1991)Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants (2015)The science of fake news (2018)Racial differences in institutional trust and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal (2021)A longitudinal study of vaccine hesitancy attitudes and social influence as predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US (2022)COVID-19 Study on Scientific Articles in Health Communication: A Science Mapping Analysis in Web of Science (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse949 cited
  • 2013Online Medical Professionalism: Patient and Public Relationships: Policy Statement From the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards420 cited
  • 2019Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium165 cited
  • 2015Self-correction in science at work143 cited
  • 2020An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-1994 cited
  • 2020Backlash Over Meat Dietary Recommendations Raises Questions About Corporate Ties to Nutrition Scientists35 cited
  • 2017Evidence reversal—when new evidence contradicts current claims: a systematic overview review of definitions and terms21 cited
  • 2020The Landscape of Medical Literature in the Era of COVID-19: Original Research Versus Opinion Pieces8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work