SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to improve assessments of publication integrity
14 references·0 citing·48 second hop
How to improve assessments of publication integrity (2024)How to improve assessments of publication…Rethinking the retraction process (2022)Rethinking the retraction pro…Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)Prevalence of questionable re…Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis (2022)Identifying and managing prob…Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences (2022)Identification of human gene …Identical summary statistics were uncommon in randomized trials and cohort studies (2021)Identical summary statistics …False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia (2020)False individual patient data…Correcting the scientific record – A broken system? (2020)Correcting the scientific rec…Check for publication integrity before misconduct (2020)Check for publication integri…Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions (2019)Quality of reports of investi…Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research (2019)Assessing and Raising Concern…Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience (2018)Analysis and Correction of In…What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification (2016)What Anaesthesia is doing to …The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)The analysis of 168 randomise…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Scientific Utopia (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Systematic review and statistical analysis of the integrity of 33 randomized controlled trials (2016)Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility (2018)Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group (2021)A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity (2024)Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? (2024)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct (2019)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science (2024)Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature (2014)Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration (2015)How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science (2023)What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions? (2023)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot (2023)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships (2007)Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science (2012)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study (2026)Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking (2011)Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions (2022)Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies (2023)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis (2024)The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool 2 (RoB 2) versus the original RoB: A perspective on the pros and cons (2024)Just Post It (2013)Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data2,022 cited
  • 2022Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands292 cited
  • 2012The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity254 cited
  • 2020False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia172 cited
  • 2020Check for publication integrity before misconduct113 cited
  • 2022Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis90 cited
  • 2018Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the Molecular and Cellular Biology Experience55 cited
  • 2019Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions42 cited
  • 2022Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences37 cited
  • 2019Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research24 cited
  • 2022Rethinking the retraction process24 cited
  • 2020Correcting the scientific record – A broken system?21 cited
  • 2016What Anaesthesia is doing to combat scientific misconduct and investigate data fabrication and falsification20 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2021Identical summary statistics were uncommon in randomized trials and cohort studies14 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.