SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

ChatGPT or Gemini: Who Makes the Better Scientific Writing Assistant? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleChatGPT or Gemini: Who Makes the Better Scientific Writing Assistant?

Hatoon S. AlSagri2024

Article2024

ChatGPT or Gemini: Who Makes the Better Scientific Writing Assistant?

Hatoon S. AlSagri · Faiza Farhat · Shahab Saquib Sohail · Abdul Khader Jilani Saudagar

24 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Academic Ethics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Artificial Intelligence in Education Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

References

2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author 2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers 2023ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove 2023The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles.2023ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing 2021Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process 2023Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?2023The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers

Cited by

2025ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Scientometric Analysis of Literature Published Between 2022 and 2023

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2024Artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT involvement in scientific and medical writing, a new concern for researchers. A scoping reviewarticle · 7 shared references 2023Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper millsarticle · 5 shared references 2023How trustworthy is ChatGPT? The case of bibliometric analysesarticle · 5 shared references 2024ChatGPT revisited: Using ChatGPT-4 for finding references and editing language in medical scientific articlesarticle · 5 shared references 2024Using AI to Write a Review Article Examining the Role of the Nervous System on Skeletal Homeostasis and Fracture Healingarticle · 5 shared references 2023Toward non-human-centered design: designing an academic article with ChatGPTarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2024

Typearticle

Published2024-07-31

VenueJournal of Academic Ethics

ISSN-L1570-1727

Languageen

Citations24

Files0 public / 0

ShelfAcademic Writing and Publishing

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s10805-024-09549-0

openalex_workW4401201260

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.