SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Investigating questionable research practices among Iranian applied linguists: Prevalence, severity, and the role of artificial intelligence tools
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Investigating questionable research practices among Iranian applied linguists: Prevalence, severity, and the role of artificial intelligence tools (2024)Investigating questionable research pract…The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of disclosing the …Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Fabrication and errors in the…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an au…Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing (2023)Can linguists distinguish bet…AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation (2023)AI did not write this manuscr…Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Responsible Conduct of Resear…Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)Prevalence of questionable re…Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: The Ethics of Quantitative Data Handling and Reporting in Applied Linguistics (2022)Misconduct and Questionable R…Sampling Bias and the Problem of Generalizability in Applied Linguistics (2020)Sampling Bias and the Problem…Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research (2020)Coming of age: the past, pres…Research Trends in Applied Linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis and Its Implications (2018)Research Trends in Applied Li…Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution (2018)Questionable research practic…Second Language Research: Methodology and Design (2017)Second Language Research: Met…Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2017)Saturation in qualitative res…Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Using thematic analysis in ps…Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place (2015)Thematic Analysis (2017)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (2010)What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? (2013)ROLE OF THE EMOTIONS AND CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT IN WILLINGNESS TO COMMUNICATE (2017)Translanguaging (2017)Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (2021)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period (2018)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)How to use and assess qualitative research methods (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated (2019)Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking (2011)Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: challenges and potential solutions (2022)Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies (2023)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove (2023)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Mapping the Ethics of Generative AI: A Comprehensive Scoping Review (2024)The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review (2025)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (1988)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review (2023)Assessing the nexus of Generative AI adoption, ethical considerations and organizational performance (2024)Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective engagement (2024)A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education (2023)ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content (2024)Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Using thematic analysis in psychology193,725 cited
  • 2017Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization11,995 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
  • 2017Second Language Research: Methodology and Design886 cited
  • 2023Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT489 cited
  • 2018Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution346 cited
  • 2022Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands292 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2023The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts264 cited
  • 2023Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing?: A study of research ethics and academic publishing260 cited
  • 2020Sampling Bias and the Problem of Generalizability in Applied Linguistics242 cited
  • 2022Responsible Conduct of Research223 cited
  • 2018Research Trends in Applied Linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis and Its Implications199 cited
  • 2023AI did not write this manuscript, or did it? Can we trick the AI text detector into generated texts? The potential future of ChatGPT and AI in Sports & Exercise Medicine manuscript generation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

168 cited
  • 2020Coming of age: the past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research122 cited
  • 2022Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: The Ethics of Quantitative Data Handling and Reporting in Applied Linguistics97 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.