SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Estimating the minimally important difference for the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Estimating the minimally important difference for the EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 in cancer (2024)Estimating the minimally important differ…The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia (2023)The Use of a Discrete Choice …Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines (2020)Which multi-attribute utility…How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods (2020)How is the minimal clinically…United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol (2019)United States Valuation of EQ…Minimally Important Difference of the EQ-5D-5L Index Score in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes (2018)Minimally Important Differenc…EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) Validity in Assessing the Quality of Life in Adults With Asthma: Cross-Sectional Study (2018)EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) Validity i…Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review (2018)Distribution- and anchor-base…EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future (2017)EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: …The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference (2016)The EQ-5D-5L health status qu…The EQ‐5D: A new tool for studying clinical outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis (2014)The EQ‐5D: A new tool for stu…Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)Development and preliminary t…A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods (2011)A point of minimal important …The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference (2010)The minimal detectable change…Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer (2007)Estimation of minimally impor…Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures (2002)Methods to Explain the Clinic…Constitution of the World Health Organization (1946)Constitution of the World Hea…The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure (1981)Measurement of health status (1989)Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life (1993)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)The New Zealand Medical Journal 1887-1987. (1987)EuroQol: the current state of play (1996)EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group (2001)Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study (2012)Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England (2017)Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States (1997)Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D (2005)The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review (2014)Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey (2014)Association of Financial Strain With Symptom Burden and Quality of Life for Patients With Lung or Colorectal Cancer (2016)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide (2003)Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols (2018)Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures (2021)Sample Size Justification (2022)EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life (1990)Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets (2012)US population norms for the EQ-5D-5L and comparison of norms from face-to-face and online samples (2020)Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Different Diseases Measured With the EQ-5D-5L: A Systematic Review (2021)Measurement Properties of the EQ VAS Around the Globe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis (2021)Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses (2016)The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data (2021)Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes (1996)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols (2022)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)Minimal important change and difference in health outcome: An overview of approaches, concepts, and methods (2023)THE FIRST TEN YEARS OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (1958)The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (2007)Purpose in Life as a System that Creates and Sustains Health and Well-Being: An Integrative, Testable Theory (2009)A systematic review of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young people (2012)Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature (2020)Danish population health measured by the EQ-5D-5L (2021)Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)10,051 cited
  • 1946Constitution of the World Health Organization2,552 cited
  • 2002Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures1,525 cited
  • 2017EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future1,252 cited
  • 2007Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer931 cited
  • 2011A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods648 cited
  • 2020How is the minimal clinically important difference established in health-related quality of life instruments? Review of anchors and methods453 cited
  • 2019United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol392 cited
  • 2020Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines310 cited
  • 2016The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference301 cited
  • 2023The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia172 cited
  • 2010The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference154 cited
  • 2018Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

145 cited
  • 2018EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) Validity in Assessing the Quality of Life in Adults With Asthma: Cross-Sectional Study114 cited
  • 2018Minimally Important Difference of the EQ-5D-5L Index Score in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes92 cited
  • 2014The EQ‐5D: A new tool for studying clinical outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis91 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.