SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
6 references·0 citing·21 second hop
LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors (2024)LETter To the EditoR Standards (LETTERS):…CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors (2024)CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (…Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication (2015)Preserving the Integrity of C…What is the role of ‘the letter to the editor’? (2014)What is the role of ‘the lett…The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensu…Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (2011)Writing a narrative biomedica…CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing (2012)Setting our bibliographic references free: towards open citation data (2015)Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers (2016)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Consensus-based recommendations for case report in Chinese medicine (CARC) (2016)How to review a case report (2016)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda (2017)Producción científica de la facultad de medicina de una universidad peruana en SCOPUS y Pubmed (2017)Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed (2019)Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
  • 2011Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors800 cited
  • 2013The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development746 cited
  • 2024CAse-BAsed REview sTandards (CABARET): Considerations for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors84 cited
  • 2015Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication59 cited
  • 2014What is the role of ‘the letter to the editor’?37 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work