SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
A living critical interpretive synthesis to yield a framework on the production and dissemination of living evidence syntheses for decision-making (2024)A living critical interpretive synthesis …The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review (2023)The problems with systematic …The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review (2021)The impact of the COVID-19 pa…Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis (2021)Decision makers need constant…The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review (2020)The impact of the COVID-19 pa…Living systematic reviews: 3. Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses (2017)Living systematic reviews: 3.…Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist (2016)When and how to update system…Wellcome Open Research (2016)Wellcome Open ResearchThe Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Erratum to: Using text mining…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…When and how to update systematic reviews (2008)When and how to update system…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups (2006)Conducting a critical interpr…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions (2005)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review (2009)Global Prevalence of Past-year Violence Against Children: A Systematic Review and Minimum Estimates (2016)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)The value of a second reviewer for study selection in systematic reviews (2019)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Updating search strategies for systematic reviews using EndNote (2017)Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driving Performance? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies (2018)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Machine learning reduced workload with minimal risk of missing studies: development and evaluation of a randomized controlled trial classifier for Cochrane Reviews (2020)Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide (2021)Disability, communication, and life itself in the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Population vs Individual Prediction of Poor Health From Results of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening (2021)Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies (2022)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2006Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups2,073 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches680 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 2016When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist424 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort354 cited
  • 2015Erratum to: Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches353 cited
  • 2016Wellcome Open Research254 cited
  • 2023The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review191 cited
  • 2021The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review189 cited
  • 2020The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review178 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

When and how to update systematic reviews
151 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 3. Statistical methods for updating meta-analyses148 cited
  • 2021Decision makers need constantly updated evidence synthesis146 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.