Efficacy of User Self-Led and Human-Supported Digital Health Interventions for People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Urška Arnautovska · Mike Trott · Kathryn Jemimah Vitangcol · Alyssa Clare Milton · Ellie Brown · Nicola Warren +3 more

26 citations0/0 files storedSchizophrenia Bulletin

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Digital Mental Health Interventions Schizophrenia research and treatment Mobile Health and mHealth Applications

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) may enable low cost, scalable improvements in the quality of care for adults with schizophrenia. Given the fast-growing number of studies using these tools, this review aimed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DHIs among people with schizophrenia, focusing on human support. DESIGN: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted in January 2024 to identify relevant RCTs. Random effects meta-analyses were undertaken to evaluate the effects on psychosis symptoms, cognition, and other health-related outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-six RCTs (n = 2481 participants) were included. Pooled recruitment and retention rates were 57.4% and 87.6%, respectively. DHIs showed no statistically significant effect sizes across all examined outcomes, including psychosis symptoms, depression, quality of life, global and social cognition, global and social functioning, and medication adherence. A third (34.6%) of DHIs were developed using co-design while the majority (70%) personalized the intervention to its users and 69.2% were deemed to be at high risk of bias. There were trends toward effects in favor of DHIs with human support for social cognition and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: DHIs are feasible for people with schizophrenia and potentially useful for improving health outcomes, particularly when including human support. More high-quality studies are required to examine the benefits of human support within DHIs. Future research should examine the feasibility of sustained adherence and benefits from digital interventions, possibly incorporating human interaction complemented with artificial intelligence, in real-world clinical settings.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1991The theory of planned behavior 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package 2011The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews 2019How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial

Cited by

2025Digital Therapeutics for People with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review of Their Effect on Symptoms and Functioning 2026Digital peer support interventions for people with mental health conditions in outpatient settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2025The era of digital mental health interventions: we know they can be effective but are they also safe?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.