SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Perspectives on the role of the intermediary in the justice system: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Perspectives on the role of the intermediary in the justice system: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis (2024)Perspectives on the role of the intermedi…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research (2020)A Review of the Quality Indic…Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Single screening versus conve…Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide (2019)Doing Qualitative Research in…The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)The Mixed Methods Appraisal T…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis (2018)Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative…Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research (2017)Employing a Qualitative Descr…Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology (2016)Manual search approaches used…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012)Enhancing transparency in rep…The qualitative content analysis process (2008)The qualitative content analy…Rigor and flexibility in computer-based qualitative research: Introducing the Coding Analysis Toolkit (2008)Rigor and flexibility in comp…Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt (2008)Conducting a meta-ethnography…‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (2007)‘Voice’ is not enough: concep…Children's participation : from tokenism to citizenship (1992)Children's participation : fr…Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide (2016)The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2016)Children: Rights, Participation and Citizenship (1999)Participation in practice: making it meaningful, effective and sustainable (2004)Children’s rights and research processes: Assisting children to (in)formed views (2011)Working With Young Children as Co-Researchers: An Approach Informed by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (2011)In defence of tokenism? Implementing children’s right to participate in collective decision-making (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES (1999)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the Literature (2021)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research (2019)Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore User Experience, Intent to Use, and Use Behavior of a Patient Portal Among Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Descriptive Qualitative Study (2019)Toward a Business Resilience Framework for Startups (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews (2009)Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review (2011)Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool ( MMAT ) (2018)Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (1996)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review (2021)Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies (2024)The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research (2024)Pathways to participation: openings, opportunities and obligations (2001)Giving Voice to Children's Voices: Practices and Problems, Pitfalls and Potentials (2007)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2008The qualitative content analysis process23,209 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,859 cited
  • 2018The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers5,254 cited
  • 2012Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ3,646 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,503 cited
  • 2017Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research2,475 cited
  • 2007‘Voice’ is not enough: conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child2,356 cited
  • 1992Children's participation : from tokenism to citizenship2,108 cited
  • 2020A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research1,360 cited
  • 2008Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt991 cited
  • 2018Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis706 cited
  • 2019Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review639 cited
  • 2019Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

260 cited
  • 2016Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology127 cited
  • 2008Rigor and flexibility in computer-based qualitative research: Introducing the Coding Analysis Toolkit95 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.