SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Risk of Bias in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Studies Using QUADAS-2
15 references·0 citing·40 second hopsampled
Risk of Bias in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Studies Using QUADAS-2 (2024)Risk of Bias in Liver Imaging Reporting a…Best Practice for MRI Diagnostic Accuracy Research With Lessons and Examples from the LI‐RADS Individual Participant Data Group (2023)Best Practice for MRI Diagnos…Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Radiology: How to Recognize and Address Potential Sources of Bias (2021)Diagnostic Accuracy Studies i…Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test (2019)Recognising bias in studies o…Verification bias (2018)Verification biasReporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnost…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions (2011)Verification problems in diag…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …The STARD Statement for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Application to the History and Physical Examination (2008)The STARD Statement for Repor…Spectrum bias--why clinicians need to be cautious when applying diagnostic test studies (2008)Spectrum bias--why clinicians…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool …A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools (2005)A systematic review finds tha…Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Towards complete and accurate…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (2005)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Detecting depressive and anxiety disorders in distressed patients in primary care; comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (2009)Risk of bias from inclusion of patients who already have diagnosis of or are undergoing treatment for depression in diagnostic accuracy studies of screening tools for depression: systematic review (2011)Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy (2014)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014)Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods (2007)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,588 cited
  • 2003Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.862 cited
  • 2006Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies769 cited
  • 2008Spectrum bias--why clinicians need to be cautious when applying diagnostic test studies153 cited
  • 2011Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions107 cited
  • 2008The STARD Statement for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Application to the History and Physical Examination87 cited
  • 2005A systematic review finds that diagnostic reviews fail to incorporate quality despite available tools79 cited
  • 2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
  • 2018Verification bias48 cited
  • 2019Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

46 cited
  • 2021Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Radiology: How to Recognize and Address Potential Sources of Bias15 cited
  • 2023Best Practice for MRI Diagnostic Accuracy Research With Lessons and Examples from the LI‐RADS Individual Participant Data Group10 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.