Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing

16 references·5 citing·53 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences65,813 cited
2016Thematic analysis6,520 cited
2014Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err3,203 cited
2019Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment2,045 cited
2003The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research2,027 cited
2023Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers1,097 cited
2023ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing913 cited
2019A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making809 cited
2024Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool574 cited
2020Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension552 cited
2020Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension483 cited
2020Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry401 cited
2005Publish or Perish371 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability312 cited

2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users’ Views265 cited

2014Journalist versus news consumer : The perceived credibility of machine written news88 cited

Cited by

2025Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntary27 cited
2025Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review24 cited
2025The ethics of erroneous AI-generated scientific figures19 cited
2025A Cross‐Disciplinary Analysis of AI Policies in Academic Peer Review17 cited
2025The end of experimental research as we know it? A perspective on generative artificial intelligence in communication science3 cited