SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool (2024)A mixed-methods survey and focus group st…Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews (2021)Dealing with predatory journa…A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019 (2021)A Review of Key Likert Scale …The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus (2020)The Delphi Technique: Making …One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? (2020)One size fits all? What count…Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)How predatory journals leak i…Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2017)Saturation in qualitative res…Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data (2017)Promote scientific integrity …How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes (2016)How Many Focus Groups Are Eno…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Google Scholar as replacement…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Three Approaches to Qualitati…Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (2004)Research Methods for Clinical…Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Improving the Quality of Web …Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (1989)Focus Groups: A Practical Gui…Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Thematic Analysis (2017)Qualitative research and evaluation methods (1980)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research (2013)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. (1968)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? (2018)A consumer definition of eco-friendly packaging (2019)What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research (2019)An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts (1963)Foundations of Behavioral Research (1974)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011)Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies (2014)Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map (2020)Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (1998)Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period (2018)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)How to use and assess qualitative research methods (2020)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches (2020)A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis (2021)Thematic Analysis (2022)Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study (2010)THEMATIC ANALYSIS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ITS PROCESS AND EVALUATION (2012)Thematic Analysis (2014)A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians (2008)Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants (1994)Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis (2017)The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis44,511 cited
  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 1989Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research15,489 cited
  • 2017Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization11,995 cited
  • 2020One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?9,627 cited
  • 2004Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)6,450 cited
  • 2020The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus4,498 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2016How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes1,749 cited
  • 2004Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology932 cited
  • 2021A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019780 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2013Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough224 cited
  • 2018How predatory journals leak into PubMed142 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data72 cited
  • 2021Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews71 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.