SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update (2024)Yet another problem with systematic revie…The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review (2023)The problems with systematic …Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Excluding non-English publica…Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews (2017)Grey literature in systematic…Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Association Between Risk-of-B…False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review (2016)False-positive findings in Co…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews (2013)The Impact of Study Size on M…A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses (2013)A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane…Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses (2012)Effect of reporting bias on m…Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study (2011)Dealing with substantial hete…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process (2010)Bias Due to Changes in Specif…Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses (2008)Apparently conclusive meta-an…The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)The appropriateness of asymme…Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary (2005)Language of publication restr…The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)The inclusion of reports of r…Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)Citation Contamination by Pap…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis (2017)The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods (2009)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2012)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies (2015)Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials (2015)Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Using the bayesmeta R Package (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses (2019)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection (2019)Risk and protective factors for mental health in elite athletes: a scoping review (2019)Restricting evidence syntheses of interventions to English-language publications is a viable methodological shortcut for most medical topics: a systematic review (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Research Review: The effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents – a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (2018)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020)Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study (2020)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Sleep duration and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews (2020)Sleep timing, sleep consistency, and health in adults: a systematic review (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2007The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey1,048 cited
  • 2008Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses917 cited
  • 2013The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews672 cited
  • 2013A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses508 cited
  • 2003The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews499 cited
  • 2019Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study440 cited
  • 2017Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study381 cited
  • 2017Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews325 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2016False-positive findings in Cochrane meta-analyses with and without application of trial sequential analysis: an empirical review278 cited
  • 2012

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses
254 cited
  • 2011Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study217 cited
  • 2005Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary206 cited
  • 2023The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review191 cited
  • 2010Bias Due to Changes in Specified Outcomes during the Systematic Review Process164 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences25 cited