SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Can peer review accolade awards motivate reviewers? A large-scale quasi-natural experiment (2024)Can peer review accolade awards motivate …SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research (2023)SciSciNet: A large-scale open…The Structure of Intrinsic Motivation (2021)The Structure of Intrinsic Mo…The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions (2020)Intrinsic and extrinsic motiv…Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and New Product Development Performance (2020)Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic …Science of science (2018)Science of scienceA multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)A multi-disciplinary perspect…Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige (2016)Single-blind vs Double-blind …Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment (2016)Employee Recognition and Perf…Awards: A strategic management perspective (2015)Awards: A strategic managemen…Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…The Matilda Effect in Science Communication (2013)The Matilda Effect in Science…Self-Determination Theory (2012)Self-Determination TheoryWhen and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior (2011)When and Why Incentives (Don'…Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making. (2008)Less power or powerless? Egoc…Motivation Crowding Theory (2001)Motivation Crowding TheoryTHE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (2002)A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender Gaps (2016)Gender bias in scholarly peer review (2017)Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health (2019)Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting (1997)A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999)Gender Differences in Preferences (2009)Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? (2012)Is Pay for Performance Detrimental to Innovation? (2013)Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (1985)Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions (2000)The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior (2000)Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice (2021)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Research in Organizational Behavior (1984)Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation (1991)Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. (2000)Self‐control: An integrative framework (2023)The role of rewards in motivation—Beyond dichotomies (2024)The impact of recognition, fairness, and leadership on employee outcomes: A large-scale multi-group analysis (2025)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Psychological foundations of incentives (2002)Identity and the Economics of Organizations (2005)Incentives and Prosocial Behavior (2006)Self‐Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self‐Determination, and Will? (2006)How Technology Is Changing Work and Organizations (2016)The influence of tourism experience and well-being on place attachment (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions6,009 cited
  • 2012Self-Determination Theory3,158 cited
  • 2001Motivation Crowding Theory3,026 cited
  • 2011When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior1,739 cited
  • 2018Science of science1,494 cited
  • 2013The Matilda Effect in Science Communication469 cited
  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • 2014Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping337 cited
  • 2021The Structure of Intrinsic Motivation332 cited
  • 2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
  • 2016Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment268 cited
  • 2016Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige192 cited
  • 2008Less power or powerless? Egocentric empathy gaps and the irony of having little versus no power in social decision making.192 cited
  • 2015Awards: A strategic management perspective160 cited
  • 2023SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science research129 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and New Product Development Performance122 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.