SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents
0 references·5 citing·18 second hop
AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents (2024)AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynami…Evaluation of Large Language Models for Peer Review in Transplantation Research: Algorithm Validation Study (2026)Evaluation of Large Language …Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges (2026)Artificial intelligence in sc…PaperEval: A universal, quantitative, and explainable paper evaluation method powered by a multi-agent system (2025)PaperEval: A universal, quant…Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities (2025)Large language models in peer…Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey (2025)Large language models for aut…Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Ensuring peer review integrity in the era of large language models: A critical stocktaking of challenges, red flags, and recommendations (2025)Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of large language models: advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects – An opinion paper (2025)Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change (2016)Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology (2019)A quasi-experimental analysis of capabilities and limitations of generative AI in academic content evaluation in social sciences (2025)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Bias in peer review (2012)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2025Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey34 cited
  • 2025PaperEval: A universal, quantitative, and explainable paper evaluation method powered by a multi-agent system22 cited
  • 2025Large language models in peer review: challenges and opportunities15 cited
  • 2026Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challenges13 cited
  • 2026Evaluation of Large Language Models for Peer Review in Transplantation Research: Algorithm Validation Study7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work