SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Identifying fabricated networks within authorship-for-sale enterprises (2024)Identifying fabricated networks within au…Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Publication and collaboration…AI intensifies fight against ‘paper mills’ that churn out fake research (2023)AI intensifies fight against …The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns (2020)The effect of Russian Univers…Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Digital magic, or the dark ar…The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal (2019)The “invisible hand” of peer …Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…Science of science (2018)Science of scienceDimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation (2018)Dimensions: Building Context …Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)Why articles are retracted: a…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Academic Research in the 21st…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)Why Growing Retractions Are (…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…The economics of scientific misconduct (2011)The economics of scientific m…Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates (1992)Neocortex size as a constrain…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Exploratory Research (2020)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy (2020)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies (2019)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies (2017)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data (2020)Exploring machine learning: a scientometrics approach using bibliometrix and VOSviewer (2022)Public use and public funding of science (2022)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century (2016)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans (1993)Evolution in the Social Brain (2007)Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates2,538 cited
  • 2018Science of science1,494 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition685 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication390 cited
  • 2018Dimensions: Building Context for Search and Evaluation324 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2013Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign272 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2016Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central212 cited
  • 2020Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?133 cited
  • 2011The economics of scientific misconduct113 cited
  • 2023Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill101 cited
  • 2020The effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on publications and collaboration patterns

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

81 cited
  • 2023AI intensifies fight against ‘paper mills’ that churn out fake research63 cited
  • 2019The “invisible hand” of peer review: The implications of author-referee networks on peer review in a scholarly journal48 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.