SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines
11 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines (2025)Generative artificial intelligence in hig…Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis (2023)Transforming Education: A Com…The impact of ChatGPT on higher education (2023)The impact of ChatGPT on high…The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT (2023)The false positives and false…The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors (2023)The Effectiveness of Software…How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing (2023)How ChatGPT and other AI tool…Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities (2023)Generative AI tools and asses…From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)From human writing to artific…Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning (2023)Education in the Era of Gener…Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT (2023)Chatting and cheating: Ensuri…Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened (2023)Artificial Intelligence Can G…Whose Data? Which Rights? Whose Power? A Policy Discourse Analysis of Student Privacy Policy Documents (2020)Whose Data? Which Rights? Who…GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences (2020)On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models (2021)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology (2023)Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science (2021)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education (2023)El impacto de la inteligencia artificial generativa en educación superior: una mirada desde la ética y la integridad académica (2023)Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment (2023)Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists (2023)Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor (2023)ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing (2023)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)Combating misinformation in the age of LLMs: Opportunities and challenges (2024)Current safeguards, risk mitigation, and transparency measures of large language models against the generation of health disinformation: repeated cross sectional analysis (2024)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? (2023)Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students (2024)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: a study among university students in the UAE (2024)Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities' policies, resources, and guidelines (2024)RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysis (2025)Motivational processes affecting learning. (1986)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI (2024)Survey on AI-Generated Plagiarism Detection: The Impact of Large Language Models on Academic Integrity (2024)The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science (2023)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)Science communication with generative AI (2024)Quantifying large language model usage in scientific papers (2025)Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (2003)How Learning Works : Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching (2010)Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity (2025)Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective (2023)The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment (2024)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT4,097 cited
  • 2023Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning2,993 cited
  • 2023Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis959 cited
  • 2023From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing923 cited
  • 2023The impact of ChatGPT on higher education681 cited
  • 2023Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities610 cited
  • 2023Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened301 cited
  • 2023The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT218 cited
  • 2023How ChatGPT and other AI tools could disrupt scientific publishing120 cited
  • 2023The Effectiveness of Software Designed to Detect AI-Generated Writing: A Comparison of 16 AI Text Detectors109 cited
  • 2020Whose Data? Which Rights? Whose Power? A Policy Discourse Analysis of Student Privacy Policy Documents65 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work