Articlehybrid2025

Consumer brand choice in the metaverse: Exploring personal and social factors

Aline Simonetti · Luis Fernando Rico Navas

19 citations0/0 files storedTechnological Forecasting and Social Change

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification Digital Marketing and Social Media Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Abstract

Brands increasingly consider the metaverse a promising touchpoint for customer-brand interactions. This study investigates consumers' willingness to pay for brands in the metaverse when a default-free option exists. It examines how social contexts influence these decisions. Additionally, we assess the similarities between virtual and real-life purchase decisions. We apply the theoretical lenses of psychological motives, including self-identity, group identity, and status, alongside the theory of consumption values to identify drivers of branded purchase decisions. In a cross-cultural survey experiment, participants were asked to choose a phone for their avatars, encountering branded and free-of-charge options. We manipulated the social context (friends or strangers) and recorded preferences for real-life consumption. Results show that most consumers allocate their virtual budget to acquire a branded phone rather than take the free option, regardless of social company. The selected brand often mirrors the brand owned in real life and mostly reflects the brand that best represents the consumer. Status-seeking behavior increases branded-product choices, while group identity motivates choosing a brand that represents the consumer. This study advances the understanding of consumer purchase behavior in the metaverse as an omnipresent virtual extension of real life by highlighting psychological and value-driven mechanisms underlying virtual brand decisions. • Consumers are willing to pay for virtual branded products in the metaverse. • The presence of others, avatars, does not change the willingness to pay pattern • Real life possession affects brand choice in the metaverse. • Status-seeking is related to choosing a branded virtual product.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 19 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Possessions and the Extended Self 1982Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions 1991Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values 2005Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research 2005Self‐Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning 2011A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing 1999Status Consumption in Consumer Behavior: Scale Development and Validation 2022Metaverse marketing: How the metaverse will shape the future of consumer research and practice

Cited by

2025Wearing thin or wearing on? A mixed-method study of continued use and word-of-mouth intentions toward fitness wearables

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.