A meta-analysis of gain–loss framing effects in narrative persuasion

Abstract

Abstract This meta-analytic study synthesizes research on the persuasive impact of gain–loss framing in narrative guided by the social cognitive theory. A combined analysis of 47 experimental studies (N = 16,361) shows an overall persuasive efficacy of gain-framed narratives (vs. loss-framed) at enhancing self-efficacy (d = 0.17, p = .009). The results also indicated that gain-framed narratives produce less counterarguing (d = −0.57, p = .042) and more positive message evaluation (d = 0.25, p = .006) while inducing less transportation (d = −0.07, p = .039) compared to loss-framed narratives. Moderation analyses further revealed loss-framed narratives’ (vs. gain-framed) relative efficacy in improving behavioral intention when the story is written in the third-person perspective or promoting donation behaviors. Study findings illuminate some important boundary conditions and mechanisms of gain–loss framing effects specific to narrative persuasion.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.