SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial
9 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and Completion: A Quasi-Randomized Interventional Trial (2025)Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Rev…Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers? (2022)Should peer reviewers be paid…The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers? (2021)The $450 question: Should jou…A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review (2021)A billion-dollar donation: es…How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)How a torrent of COVID scienc…Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having (2017)Medical Preprints—A Debate Wo…What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics (2014)What Policies Increase Prosoc…Submission Fees and Response Times in Academic Publishing (2013)Submission Fees and Response …Does Paying Referees Expedite Reviews?: Results of a Natural Experiment (2010)Does Paying Referees Expedite…Free Labor for Costly Journals? (2001)Free Labor for Costly Journal…The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process (2000)The Effects of Double-Blind versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from The American Economic Review (2016)On publication, refereeing and working hard (2018)American Economic Review (2019)Peer Review as an Evolving Response to Organizational Constraint: Evidence from Sociology Journals, 1952–2018 (2020)Modelling Scientific Communities (2023)Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design (1991)Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All* (2000)The Hidden Costs of Control (2006)On the money value of peer review (2018)Publication speed in pharmacy practice journals: A comparative analysis (2021)The challenge of recruiting peer reviewers from one medical journal’s perspective (2022)A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999)Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness (2008)Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivations for Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Germany (2016)Shaming tax delinquents (2018)Impact of community masking on COVID-19: A cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh (2022)The Case for Open Preprints in Biology (2013)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct (2019)Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review (2022)PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (2023)Science Since Babylon (1961)Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education (2022)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey (2023)Rethinking Plagiarism in the Era of Generative AI (2024)Journal Pricing and Mergers: A Portfolio Approach (2002)Evaluating big deal journal bundles (2014)IDENTIFYING THE EFFECT OF OPEN ACCESS ON CITATIONS USING A PANEL OF SCIENCE JOURNALS (2014)Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates (2021)Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling (2023)Five problems plaguing publishing in the life sciences—and one common cause (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts387 cited
  • 2021A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review305 cited
  • 2001Free Labor for Costly Journals?286 cited
  • 2014What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics117 cited
  • 2022Should peer reviewers be paid to review academic papers?71 cited
  • 2017Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having52 cited
  • 2021The $450 question: Should journals pay peer reviewers?35 cited
  • 2013Submission Fees and Response Times in Academic Publishing33 cited
  • 2010Does Paying Referees Expedite Reviews?: Results of a Natural Experiment31 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work