INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF FIREFIGHTERS' SENSE OF SECURITY

Abstract

In a dynamic world where change is the only constant value, professional development has become a key element of success – not only for individual employees but also for the growth of the entire organization. Traditional training methods and courses are often insufficient, making it essential to explore innovative approaches that can revolutionize the way personnel training is conducted. This type of change in approach to professional development is also needed by firefighters. This article focuses on identifying the key factors that determine firefighters' professional growth in the context of their sense of security. As a result of the conducted research, it has been proven that an innovative approach to professional development requires focus on personalization, practical experience, the use of technology, mentoring, and fostering a culture of continuous learning. Through these methods, employees not only acquire new skills but also become more engaged in their work, which leads to better organizational performance. As regards firefighters, this translates into more effective rescue operations, greater organizational efficiency, and a reduced risk of occupational hazards. Given constant change and emerging challenges in the safety environment, investing in firefighters' professional development is the key to success in ensuring their security. The research focused on analysing relevant literature, reports and source documents related to firefighters' sense of safety, as well as identifying and evaluating factors affecting their safety in the context of professional development. The complexity of the issue and the need for innovative approach to firefighters' career growth were highlighted through an analysis of information obtained from expert interviews conducted with 50 specialists in the field.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.