SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing: Balancing Innovation and Efficiency with Integrity: Perspectives and Position Statements of Global Andrology Forum Expert Group
16 references·0 citing·51 second hop
Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Writing: Balancing Innovation and Efficiency with Integrity: Perspectives and Position Statements of Global Andrology Forum Expert Group (2025)Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Wri…The EU passes the AI Act and its implications for digital medicine are unclear (2024)The EU passes the AI Act and …The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024): Implications for healthcare (2024)The EU Artificial Intelligenc…Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis (2024)Publishers’ and journals’ ins…Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: Current Trends (2024)Ethical Use of Artificial Int…Authorship and AI tools (2024)Authorship and AI toolsThe use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers (2023)The use of artificial intelli…Making decisions: Bias in artificial intelligence and data‑driven diagnostic tools (2023)Making decisions: Bias in art…How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect Scientific Writing, Reviewing and Editing? The Future is Here … (2023)How Will Artificial Intellige…Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Re…Editorial: Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem (2023)Editorial: Generative artific…ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks (2023)ChatGPT in academic writing: …Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance (2023)Artificial intelligence in ac…AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community (2023)AI-generated research paper f…AI-assisted peer review (2021)AI-assisted peer reviewAddressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science (2021)Addressing bias in big data a…The arbitrariness of reviews, and advice for school administrators (2015)The arbitrariness of reviews,…Bias in peer review (2012)Big Data's Disparate Impact (2014)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)WEIRD languages have misled us, too (2010)Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations (2019)Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation (2023)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT (2023)Could AI help you to write your next paper? (2022)Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's Perspective (2023)The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. (2023)Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool (2024)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics (2017)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)The Tech Cold War, the multipolarization of the world economy, and IB research (2023)The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment (2024)The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks (2024)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (2023)Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality? (2024)Reporting Use of AI in Research and Scholarly Publication—JAMA Network Guidance (2024)Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals (2024)The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science (2007)AI-Based Modeling: Techniques, Applications and Research Issues Towards Automation, Intelligent and Smart Systems (2022)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing (2024)Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: Enhancing Efficiency While Preserving Integrity (2025)Scientific Writing of Novice Researchers: What Difficulties and Encouragements Do They Encounter? (2009)Literature search for research planning and identification of research problem (2016)ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)Bibliometric Analysis on ChatGPT Research with CiteSpace (2025)Exploring the ethical landscape of AI in academic writing (2025)Predicting Kazakhstani TEFL students’ continuance intention towards using ChatGPT in academic writing (2025)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Guidelines for ethical use and acknowledgement of large language models in academic writing (2024)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Brussels Effect (2019)Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach (2021)23 Artificial Intelligence Act (2024)Balancing Innovation and Control: The European Union AI Act in an Era of Global Uncertainty (2025)Building Symbiotic Artificial Intelligence: Reviewing the AI Act for a Human-Centred, Principle-Based Framework (2025)Emotionally adaptive support: a narrative review of affective computing for mental health (2025)GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing (2025)When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)Responsible use of large language models in manuscript authorship, peer review, and editorial processes: a Delphi consensus among editors-in-chief of anaesthesia and pain medicine journals (RULE-AP) (2026)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science971 cited
  • 2024Publishers’ and journals’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis353 cited
  • 2024The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024): Implications for healthcare314 cited
  • 2021AI-assisted peer review284 cited
  • 2023AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community196 cited
  • 2023The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers158 cited
  • 2023Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots141 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance136 cited
  • 2024Authorship and AI tools105 cited
  • 2023ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks80 cited
  • 2024The EU passes the AI Act and its implications for digital medicine are unclear69 cited
  • 2023How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect Scientific Writing, Reviewing and Editing? The Future is Here …69 cited
  • 2024Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Writing: Current Trends62 cited
  • 2023Making decisions: Bias in artificial intelligence and data‑driven diagnostic tools

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

58 cited
  • 2023Editorial: Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem53 cited
  • 2015The arbitrariness of reviews, and advice for school administrators49 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.