SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Variation in sensitivity and specificity of diverse diagnostic tests across health-care settings: a meta-epidemiological study
11 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Variation in sensitivity and specificity of diverse diagnostic tests across health-care settings: a meta-epidemiological study (2025)Variation in sensitivity and specificity …The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy (2023)The association of sensitivit…Metadta: a Stata command for meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic test accuracy data – a tutorial (2022)Metadta: a Stata command for …What is a meta-epidemiological study? Analysis of published literature indicated heterogeneous study designs and definitions (2020)What is a meta-epidemiologica…Common evidence gaps in point-of-care diagnostic test evaluation: a review of horizon scan reports (2017)Common evidence gaps in point…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data (2014)Metaprop: a Stata command to …Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence (2013)Variation of a test’s sensiti…Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis (2008)Diagnostic test accuracy may …Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Evidence of bias and variatio…Sensitivity and Specificity should be De-emphasized in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2003)Sensitivity and Specificity s…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2005)Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey (2006)Predictive Validity Performance Indicators in Violence Risk Assessment: A Methodological Primer (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (2004)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Statistics for Experimenters (1979)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Addressing overestimation of the prevalence of depression based on self-report screening questionnaires (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations (2005)Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways (2006)Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care (2012)Overcoming Challenges With the Adoption of Point-of-Care Testing (2020)Target Product Profiles for medical tests: a systematic review of current methods (2020)Looking at the fringes of MedTech innovation: a mapping review of horizon scanning and foresight methods (2023)A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Comparison and validation of metadta for meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (2023)Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (2023)Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis: A Practical Guide to Hierarchical Models (2025)Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach (2006)Hierarchical models that address measurement error are needed to evaluate the correlation between treatment effect and control group event rate (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,588 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,287 cited
  • 2014Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data2,136 cited
  • 2006Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies612 cited
  • 2013Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence535 cited
  • 2008Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis484 cited
  • 2022Metadta: a Stata command for meta-analysis and meta-regression of diagnostic test accuracy data – a tutorial156 cited
  • 2003Sensitivity and Specificity should be De-emphasized in Diagnostic Accuracy Studies100 cited
  • 2023The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy99 cited
  • 2017Common evidence gaps in point-of-care diagnostic test evaluation: a review of horizon scan reports66 cited
  • 2020What is a meta-epidemiological study? Analysis of published literature indicated heterogeneous study designs and definitions32 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work