SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Exploring the change in scientific readability following the release of ChatGPT
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Exploring the change in scientific readability following the release of ChatGPT (2025)Exploring the change in scientific readab…Estimating the use of ChatGPT in dental research publications (2024)Estimating the use of ChatGPT…ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT’s capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Data Predictor (2024)ChatGPT as Research Scientist…Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)Risks of abuse of large langu…Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Fighting reviewer fatigue or …Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT (2023)Fabrication and errors in the…Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing (2023)Editors’ statement on the res…ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing (2023)ChatGPT and a new academic re…Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications (2023)Chatbots, generative AI, and …Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review (2023)Artificial intelligence to su…AI tools can improve equity in science (2023)AI tools can improve equity i…The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses (2022)The relationship between read…The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)The evolving role of preprint…The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature (2020)The role of geographical prox…How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv (2020)How many preprints have actua…Readability and Research Impact (2018)Readability and Research Impa…The readability of articles in tourism journals (2015)The readability of articles i…Unintelligible Management Research and Academic Prestige (1980)Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact (2007)The tourism knowledge system (2015)Readability and citations in information science: evidence from abstracts and articles of four journals (2003–2012) (2016)Unclipping our wings: Ways forward in qualitative research in sport management (2016)The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals (2013)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences (2020)Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing (2020)Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use (2023)Exploring Chinese University Educators’ Acceptance and Intention to Use AI Tools: An Application of the UTAUT2 Model (2024)Human-AI collaboration to identify literature for evidence synthesis (2024)Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)HISTORIAE, History of Socio-Cultural Transformation as Linguistic Data Science. A Humanities Use Case (2019)Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics (2023)Artificial intelligence in developing countries: The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for development (2023)Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism (2023)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT for Automating Systematic Review Process: Methodology, Case Study, Limitations, and Future Directions (2023)The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts (2023)The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2024)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)Inteligencia artificial, investigación y revisión por pares: escenarios futuros y estrategias de acción (2023)Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal Reviewers (2025)When and how to disclose AI use in academic publishing: AMEE Guide No.192 (2025)A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education (2023)AI hallucination: towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content (2024)Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabulary (2025)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing (2025)Maintaining research integrity in the age of GenAI: an analysis of ethical challenges and recommendations to researchers (2025)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2017)Generative artificial intelligence for academic research: evidence from guidance issued for researchers by higher education institutions in the United States (2025)Influence of Topic Familiarity and Prompt Specificity on Citation Fabrication in Mental Health Research Using Large Language Models: Experimental Study (2025)Risks of AI scientists: prioritizing safeguarding over autonomy (2025)AI vs academia: Experimental study on AI text detectors’ accuracy in behavioral health academic writing (2024)Defining the Boundaries of AI Use in Scientific Writing: A Comparative Review of Editorial Policies (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing913 cited
  • 2021The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape556 cited
  • 2023Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT489 cited
  • 2023Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review268 cited
  • 2023Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review160 cited
  • 2023Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills100 cited
  • 2023AI tools can improve equity in science83 cited
  • 2024ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT’s capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Data Predictor66 cited
  • 2015The readability of articles in tourism journals61 cited
  • 2023Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications59 cited
  • 2022The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses52 cited
  • 2020How many preprints have actually been printed and why: a case study of computer science preprints on arXiv51 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020
The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature
50 cited
  • 2023Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing47 cited
  • 2018Readability and Research Impact28 cited
  • 2024Estimating the use of ChatGPT in dental research publications26 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.